Book Review:Philosophy of Logic Willard Van Orman Quine [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||LOGIC PHILOSOPHY TRUTH IMPLICATION DEDUCTION VISIBLY SOUND LOGICAL TRUTH SCHEMATA TRUTH-PRESERVATION CONSEQUENCE-PRESERVATION|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
No references found.
No citations found.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads26 ( #115,554 of 1,725,297 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #56,064 of 1,725,297 )
How can I increase my downloads?
|Start a new thread||There is 1 thread in this forum|
State University of New York, Buffalo
JOHN CORCORAN, Two-method errors.
Where there are two or more methods for the same thing, sometimes errors occur if two are mixed. Two-method errors, TMEs, occur in technical contexts but they occur more frequently in non-technical writing. Examples of both are cited.
We can say “Abe knows whether Ben draws” in two other ways: ‘Abe knows whether or not Ben draws’ or ‘Abe knows whether Ben draws or not’. But a TME occurs in ‘Abe knows whether or not Ben draws or not’.
We can say “Abe knows how Ben looks” using ‘Abe knows what Ben looks like’. But a TME occurs in ‘Abe knows what Ben looks’ and also in ‘Abe knows how Ben looks like’. Again, we can deny that Abe knows Ben by prefixing ‘It isn’t that’ or by interpolating ‘doesn’t’. But a TME occurs in trying to deny that Abe knows Ben by using ‘It isn’t that Abe doesn’t know Ben’.
There are two standard ways of defining truth for first-order languages: using finite sequences or infinite sequences. Quine’s discussion in the 1970 first ... (read more)