Dead Certain

Human Nature 23 (1):98-126 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evolutionary psychologists have suggested that confidence and conservatism promoted aggression in our ancestral past, and that this may have been an adaptive strategy given the prevailing costs and benefits of conflict. However, in modern environments, where the costs and benefits of conflict can be very different owing to the involvement of mass armies, sophisticated technology, and remote leadership, evolved tendencies toward high levels of confidence and conservatism may continue to be a contributory cause of aggression despite leading to greater costs and fewer benefits. The purpose of this paper is to test whether confidence and conservatism are indeed associated with greater levels of aggression—in an explicitly political domain. We present the results of an experiment examining people’s levels of aggression in response to hypothetical international crises (a hostage crisis, a counter-insurgency campaign, and a coup). Levels of aggression (which range from concession to negotiation to military attack) were significantly predicted by subjects’ (1) confidence that their chosen policy would succeed, (2) score on a liberal-conservative scale, (3) political party affiliation, and (4) preference for the use of military force in real-world U.S. policy toward Iraq and Iran. We discuss the possible adaptive and maladaptive implications of confidence and conservatism for the prospects of war and peace in the modern world.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What we owe the dead.J. Jeremy Wisnewski - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):54-70.
How the Dead Live.Niall Connolly - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (1):83-103.
Buddhist Philosophy of the Dead.Fumihiko Sueki - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 6:259-265.
Research on dead infants.R. S. Downie - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (2):161-175.
Reevaluating the Dead Donor Rule.Mike Collins - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):1-26.
The dead donor rule: Not dead yet.Laura A. Siminoff - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):30.
Woman wants dead fiance's baby: who owns a dead man's sperm.M. Spriggs - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):384-388.
Dead Bored: Debord’s Dead.Andrew Hussey - 1995 - Philosophy Now 14:22-23.
Ex Post Facto: Peirce and the Living Signs of the Dead.Kieran Cashell - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (2):345-372.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
42 (#330,341)

6 months
3 (#439,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?