Discourse ethics and the normative justification of tolerance
Critical Horizons 1 (2):281-305 (2000)
| Abstract | The following paper considers the extent to which discourse ethics can adequately respond to Habermas' own call for normative justification for the expectation of tolerance. It concludes that discourse ethics is able to lend its services to the flagging fortunes of the idea of toleration, not by seeking to underscore this idea with rationally compelling argumentation,but by offering insights into the possibilities opened up to a life which accepts this principle. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesP. X. Monaghan (2010). A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms. Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
H. M. Malm (1989). Commodification or Compensation: A Reply to Ketchum. Hypatia 4 (3):128 - 135.
H. E. Baber (1987). How Bad Is Rape? Hypatia 2 (2):125 - 138.
H. Hamner Hill (1987). A Functional Taxonomy of Normative Conflict. Law and Philosophy 6 (2):227 - 247.
Elizabeth F. Cooke (2003). On the Possibility of a Pragmatic Discourse Bioethics: Putnam, Habermas, and the Normative Logic of Bioethical Inquiry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (5 & 6):635 – 653.
Jean Keller (2008). Dialogue Among Friends: Toward a Discourse Ethic of Interpersonal Relationships. Hypatia 23 (4):pp. 158-181.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,586 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
