Sophia 46 (1):69-73 (2007)
|Abstract||In Atheism: A Philosophical Justification, Michael Martin argues that to posit a God that is both omnipotent and omniscient is philosophically incoherent. I challenge this argument by proposing that a God who is necessarily omniscient is more powerful than a God who is contingently omniscient. I then argue that being omnipotent entails being omniscient by showing that for an all-powerful being to be all-powerful in any meaningful way, it must possess complete knowledge about all states of affairs and thus must be understood to be omniscient.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rik Peels (forthcoming). Is Omniscience Impossible? Religious Studies.
Laura L. Garcia (1993). Timelessness, Omniscience, and Tenses. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:65-82.
Richard M. Gale & Alexander R. Pruss (1999). A New Cosmological Argument. Religious Studies 35 (4):461-476.
Michael Martin (2007). Divine Incoherence. Sophia 46 (1):75-77.
Thomas Metcalf (2004). Omniscience and Maximal Power. Religious Studies 40 (3):289-306.
Jason A. Beyer (2004). A Physicalist Rejoinder to Some Problems with Omniscience; or, How God Could Know What We Know. Sophia 43 (2):5-13.
Steven J. Brams (1982). Omniscience and Omnipotence: How They May Help - or Hurt - in a Game. Inquiry 25 (2):217 – 231.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads40 ( #33,679 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?