David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
NanoEthics 1 (1):21-30 (2007)
After reviewing portions of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act that call for examination of societal and ethical issues, this essay seeks to understand how nanoethics can play a role in nanotechnology development. What can and should nanoethics aim to achieve? The focus of the essay is on the challenges of examining ethical issues with regard to a technology that is still emerging, still ‘in the making.’ The literature of science and technology studies (STS) is used to understand the nanotechnology endeavor in a way that makes room for influence by nanoethics. The analysis emphasizes: the contingency of technology and the many actors involved in its development; a conception of technology as sociotechnical systems; and, the values infused (in a variety of ways) in technology. Nanoethicists can be among the many actors who shape the meaning and materiality of an emerging technology. Nevertheless, there are dangers that nanoethicists should try to avoid. The possibility of being co-opted from working along side nanotechnology engineers and scientists is one danger that is inseparable from trying to influence. Related but somewhat different is the danger of not asking about the worthiness of the nanotechnology enterprise as a social investment in the future.
|Keywords||Nanotechnology Nanoethics Societal issues Ethical issues Sociotechnical systems Technological development|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Guillermo Foladori, Noela Invernizzi & Edgar Záyago (2009). Two Dimensions of the Ethical Problems Related to Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 3 (2):121-127.
Céline Kermisch (2012). Do New Ethical Issues Arise at Each Stage of Nanotechnological Development? Nanoethics 6 (1):29-37.
Katie Shilton (forthcoming). Anticipatory Ethics for a Future Internet: Analyzing Values During the Design of an Internet Infrastructure. Science and Engineering Ethics:1-18.
Jean-Pierre Béland, Johane Patenaude, Georges Legault, Patrick Boissy & Monelle Parent (2011). The Social and Ethical Acceptability of NBICs for Purposes of Human Enhancement: Why Does the Debate Remain Mired in Impasse? [REVIEW] Nanoethics 5 (3):295-307.
Michael Gorman, Patricia Werhane & Nathan Swami (2009). Moral Imagination, Trading Zones, and the Role of the Ethicist in Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 3 (3):185-195.
Similar books and articles
Mette Ebbesen (2008). The Role of the Humanities and Social Sciences in Nanotechnology Research and Development. Nanoethics 2 (3):333-333.
Patrick Lin (2006). What's So Special About Nanotechnology and Nanoethics? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):179-190.
Armin Grunwald (2010). From Speculative Nanoethics to Explorative Philosophy of Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 4 (2):91-101.
Soraj Hongladarom (2009). Nanotechnology, Development and Buddhist Values. Nanoethics 3 (2):97-107.
Chris Toumey (2011). Seven Religious Reactions to Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 5 (3):251-267.
Fritz Allhoff (2007). On the Autonomy and Justification of Nanoethics. NanoEthics 1 (3):185-210.
Andrew Jamison (2009). Can Nanotechnology Be Just? On Nanotechnology and the Emerging Movement for Global Justice. Nanoethics 3 (2):129-136.
Clare Shelley-Egan (2010). The Ambivalence of Promising Technology. Nanoethics 4 (2):183-189.
Ibo van de Poel (2008). How Should We Do Nanoethics? A Network Approach for Discerning Ethical Issues in Nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2 (1):25-38.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #54,509 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?