Ethics and technology 'in the making': An essay on the challenge of nanoethics
NanoEthics 1 (1) (2007)
| Abstract | After reviewing portions of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act that call for examination of societal and ethical issues, this essay seeks to understand how nanoethics can play a role in nanotechnology development. What can and should nanoethics aim to achieve? The focus of the essay is on the challenges of examining ethical issues with regard to a technology that is still emerging, still ‘in the making.’ The literature of science and technology studies (STS) is used to understand the nanotechnology endeavor in a way that makes room for influence by nanoethics. The analysis emphasizes: the contingency of technology and the many actors involved in its development; a conception of technology as sociotechnical systems; and, the values infused (in a variety of ways) in technology. Nanoethicists can be among the many actors who shape the meaning and materiality of an emerging technology. Nevertheless, there are dangers that nanoethicists should try to avoid. The possibility of being co-opted from working along side nanotechnology engineers and scientists is one danger that is inseparable from trying to influence. Related but somewhat different is the danger of not asking about the worthiness of the nanotechnology enterprise as a social investment in the future. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMette Ebbesen (2008). The Role of the Humanities and Social Sciences in Nanotechnology Research and Development. Nanoethics 2 (3):333-333.
Patrick Lin (2006). What's So Special About Nanotechnology and Nanoethics? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):179-190.
Armin Grunwald (2010). From Speculative Nanoethics to Explorative Philosophy of Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 4 (2):91-101.
Soraj Hongladarom (2009). Nanotechnology, Development and Buddhist Values. Nanoethics 3 (2):97-107.
Chris Toumey (2011). Seven Religious Reactions to Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 5 (3):251-267.
Fritz Allhoff (2007). On the Autonomy and Justification of Nanoethics. NanoEthics 1 (3).
Andrew Jamison (2009). Can Nanotechnology Be Just? On Nanotechnology and the Emerging Movement for Global Justice. Nanoethics 3 (2):129-136.
Clare Shelley-Egan (2010). The Ambivalence of Promising Technology. Nanoethics 4 (2):183-189.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads28 ( #44,065 of 549,044 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,044 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
