Philosophy of Science 70 (4):571-592 (2004)
|Abstract||A variety of inaccurate claims about Gold's Theorem have appeared in the cognitive science literature. I begin by characterizing the logic of this theorem and its proof. I then examine several claims about Gold's Theorem, and I show why they are false. Finally, I assess the significance of Gold's Theorem for cognitive science.|
|Keywords||Acquisition Cognitive Science Language Learnability Science Gold, E|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Samuels (2002). Nativism in Cognitive Science. Mind and Language 17 (3):233-65.
Mohammed Girma (2011). Whose Meaning? The Wax and Gold Tradition as a Philosophical Foundation for an Ethiopian Hermeneutic. Sophia 50 (1):175-187.
Dedre Gentner (2010). Psychology in Cognitive Science: 1978–2038. Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (3):328-344.
Patrick Colm Hogan (2003). Cognitive Science, Literature, and the Arts: A Guide for Humanists. Routledge.
Nigel Stepp, Anthony Chemero & Michael T. Turvey (2011). Philosophy for the Rest of Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):425-437.
Max Coltheart & Robyn Langdon (1998). Autism, Modularity and Levels of Explanation in Cognitive Science. Mind and Language 13 (1):138-152.
M. Lavigne & P. Rowland (1978). Scythian Gold and the Gold- Standard : Soviet Attitudes To Gold and the International Monetary System. Diogenes 26 (101-102):26-49.
David Kirsh (1992). PDP Learnability and Innate Knowledge of Language. In S. Davis (ed.), Connectionism: Theory and practice (Volume III of The Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science. Oxford University press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #45,806 of 549,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?