“Is” and “ought”: A different connection
Journal of Value Inquiry 25 (2):147-160 (1991)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDonald C. Hubin (1999). What's Special About Humeanism. Noûs 33 (1):30-45.
Jeffrey Foss (1976). A Rule of Minimal Rationality: The Logical Link Between Beliefs and Values. Inquiry 19 (1-4):341 – 353.
Ortrun Ibens (2002). Connection Tableau Calculi with Disjunctive Constraints. Studia Logica 70 (2):241 - 270.
Tobias Hoffmann (2008). Walter Chatton on the Connection of the Virtues. Quaestio 8:57–82.
Kirk A. Ludwig (1993). A Dilemma for Searle's Argument for the Connection Principle. Behavioral And Brain Sciences 16:194-5.
Keith Lehrer & Stewart Cohen (1983). Justification, Truth, and Coherence. Synthese 55 (2):191 - 207.
M. C. Bradley (1979). Two Logical Connection Arguments and Some Principles About Causal Connection. Erkenntnis 14 (1):1 - 23.
Anthony G. Cohn & Achille C. Varzi (2003). Mereotopological Connection. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (4):357-390.
Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (1998). Reply to Richard and Reimer. Mind and Language 13 (4):617–621.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,265 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
