In Defence of a Radical Millianism

Philosophy 71 (278):521 - 530 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In order to by-pass immaterial historical bickering I shall stipulatively mean by ‘Radical Millianism’ just this much more than what Katz in his recent article in The Philosophical Review , ‘Names without Bearers’ , means by the unqualified term, ‘Millianism’; namely, whereas Katz means by ‘Millianism’ that theory of proper names which holds that proper names ‘have no linguistic meaning,’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In defence of radical disobedience.Alan Carter - 1998 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):29–47.
The One and Only Argument for Radical Millianism.Max Deutsch - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):427-445.
Defending millianism.Peter J. Graham - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):555-561.
Beyond Millianism.Leo Iacono - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (3):423 - 436.
The price of innocent millianism.Stefano Predelli - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (3):335-356.
Defending the Defense.Bryan Frances - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):563-566.
Self-control in the modern provocation defence.Richard Holton & Stephen Shute - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (1):49-73.
Recurrence.Nathan Salmon - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (3):407-441.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
45 (#311,164)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Names without bearers.Jerrold J. Katz - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (1):1-39.

Add more references