Is Vague Identity Incoherent?

Analysis 49 (3):103 - 112 (1989)
Two purported proofs of the incoherence of vague identity are considered. First gareth evans's attempt is criticized and reformulated to overcome certain formal difficulties. Despite the reformulation, However, Evans's proof is demonstrated invalid in accord with a supervaluational approach. Next nathan salmon's attempt is evaluated. Here the problem is salmon's implicit assumption of a version of leibniz's law which is stronger than that strictly guaranteed by the law as it is given in classical logic. The question is raised on what grounds this stronger version is to be considered a logical law: without it the proof fails
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/49.3.103
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,651
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Jonathan A. Simon (2014). Indeterminate Comprehension. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):39-48.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

81 ( #59,041 of 1,902,751 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

12 ( #71,058 of 1,902,751 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.