Multiple roles and successes in public bioethics: A response to the public forum critique of bioethics commissions
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):173-188 (2006)
: National bioethics commissions have been critiqued for a variety of structural, procedural, and political aspects of their work. A more recent critique published by Dzur and Levin uses political philosophy to constructively critique the work of national bioethics commissions as public deliberative forums. However, this public forum critique of bioethics commissions ignores empirical research in political science and normative claims that suggest that advisory commissions can and should have diverse of functions beyond that of being public forums. The present paper argues that the public forum critique too narrowly considers the roles that bioethics commissions can play in public bioethics and ignores the moral obligation of commissions to fulfill their mandates. Evaluations of commissions must consider that these institutions can serve in capacities other than those of a public deliberative forum and use additional measures to evaluate the multiple roles and successes of bioethics commissions in public policy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mark B. Brown (2009). Three Ways to Politicize Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):43 – 54.
Summer Mcgee (2011). Ideology and Politicization in Public Bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (1):73-84.
John H. Evans (2011). Power and Representation of the Public's Values in a Social Implications of Research Commission. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):10-11.
Similar books and articles
Udo Schuklenk (2008). National Bioethics Commissions and Partisan Politics. Bioethics 22 (6):ii–iii.
Eric M. Meslin (2010). Can National Bioethics Commissions Be Progressive? Should They? In Jonathan D. Moreno & Sam Berger (eds.), Progress in Bioethics: Science, Policy, and Politics. MIT Press
Daniel Wikler (1994). Bioethics Commissions Abroad. HEC Forum 6 (5):290-304.
Peter Singer (1989). Australian Commissions and Committees on Issues in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):403-424.
Thomas H. Murray & Ross S. White (2010). Public Engagement and Bioethics Commissions. In John Elliott, W. Calvin Ho & Sylvia S. N. Lim (eds.), Bioethics in Singapore: The Ethical Microcosm. World Scientific
Cynthia B. Cohen (2005). Promises and Perils of Public Deliberation: Contrasting Two National Bioethics Commissions on Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (3):269-288.
John R. Williams (1989). Commissions and Biomedical Ethics: The Canadian Experience. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):425-444.
Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin (2004). The "Nation's Conscience:" Assessing Bioethics Commissions as Public Forums. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):333-360.
Summer Johnson (2007). Making Public Bioethics Sufficiently Public: The Legitimacy and Authority of Bioethics Commissions. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):143-152.
Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin (2007). The Primacy of the Public: In Support of Bioethics Commissions as Deliberative Forums. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):133-142.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #196,571 of 1,939,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #217,185 of 1,939,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?