Multiple roles and successes in public bioethics: A response to the public forum critique of bioethics commissions
Graduate studies at Western
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):173-188 (2006)
|Abstract||: National bioethics commissions have been critiqued for a variety of structural, procedural, and political aspects of their work. A more recent critique published by Dzur and Levin uses political philosophy to constructively critique the work of national bioethics commissions as public deliberative forums. However, this public forum critique of bioethics commissions ignores empirical research in political science and normative claims that suggest that advisory commissions can and should have diverse of functions beyond that of being public forums. The present paper argues that the public forum critique too narrowly considers the roles that bioethics commissions can play in public bioethics and ignores the moral obligation of commissions to fulfill their mandates. Evaluations of commissions must consider that these institutions can serve in capacities other than those of a public deliberative forum and use additional measures to evaluate the multiple roles and successes of bioethics commissions in public policy|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Udo Schuklenk (2008). National Bioethics Commissions and Partisan Politics. Bioethics 22 (6):ii–iii.
Eric M. Meslin (2010). Can National Bioethics Commissions Be Progressive? Should They? In Jonathan D. Moreno & Sam Berger (eds.), Progress in Bioethics: Science, Policy, and Politics. Mit Press.
Daniel Wikler (1994). Bioethics Commissions Abroad. HEC Forum 6 (5):290-304.
Peter Singer (1989). Australian Commissions and Committees on Issues in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):403-424.
Thomas H. Murray & Ross S. White (2010). Public Engagement and Bioethics Commissions. In John Elliott, W. Calvin Ho & Sylvia S. N. Lim (eds.), Bioethics in Singapore: The Ethical Microcosm. World Scientific.
Cynthia B. Cohen (2005). Promises and Perils of Public Deliberation: Contrasting Two National Bioethics Commissions on Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (3):269-288.
John R. Williams (1989). Commissions and Biomedical Ethics: The Canadian Experience. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):425-444.
Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin (2004). The "Nation's Conscience:" Assessing Bioethics Commissions as Public Forums. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):333-360.
Summer Johnson (2007). Making Public Bioethics Sufficiently Public: The Legitimacy and Authority of Bioethics Commissions. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):143-152.
Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin (2007). The Primacy of the Public: In Support of Bioethics Commissions as Deliberative Forums. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):133-142.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #292,381 of 739,349 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?