David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):77 - 101 (1997)
This essay explores the convergence of theoretical or foundational, historical, and comparative concerns in religious ethics through the examination of two religiously informed traditions on statecraft, that shaped by Augustine's idea of the civitas dei and that shaped by classical Islamic juristic thought on the dar alislam. Three issues are examined for each tradition: the concept of normative political order, the nature of justified use of force, and the implications of their rival claims to universality. The essay shows how the normative logic and implications of each tradition can be properly understood only by attention to its historical development. It further argues that possibilities for conversation between these traditions, difficult or even nonexistent in terms of the original statements of the Augustinian and juristic ideals, may be identified by attention to the historical working out of these ideals in the practice of statecraft within the two cultures.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Rosemary B. Kellison (2014). Tradition, Authority, and Immanent Critique in Comparative Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (4):713-741.
Similar books and articles
Donald K. Swearer (1997). Caught in the Belly of a Paradox: A Response to Ronald M. Green's Review of the "Journal of Religious Ethics". Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):253 - 267.
Mari Rapela Heidt (2010). Moral Traditions: An Introduction to World Religious Ethics. Anselm Academic.
Aaron Stalnaker (2005). Comparative Religious Ethics and the Problem of “Human Nature”. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):187-224.
Aaron Stalnaker (2008). Judging Others: History, Ethics, and the Purposes of Comparison. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
Torkel Brekke (ed.) (2006). The Ethics of War in Asian Civilizations: A Comparative Perspective. Routledge.
David Little (1981). The Present State of the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):210 - 227.
John P. Reeder Jr (1994). Three Moral Traditions. Journal of Religious Ethics 22 (1):75 - 92.
John D. Barbour (1983). Religious Ressentiment and Public Virtues. Journal of Religious Ethics 11 (2):264 - 279.
William M. Sullivan & Will Kymlicka (eds.) (2007). The Globalization of Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
John Kelsay (1996). Review: Plurality, Pluralism, and Comparative Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (2):403 - 428.
Peter J. Mehl (1991). In the Twilight of Modernity: MacIntyre and Mitchell on Moral Traditions and Their Assessment. Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (1):21 - 54.
Kevin Schilbrack (2002). Teaching Comparative Religious Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):295 - 312.
Leigh Turner (2003). Bioethics and Religions: Religious Traditions and Understandings of Morality, Health, and Illness. Health Care Analysis 11 (3):181-197.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads5 ( #505,920 of 1,796,591 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,501 of 1,796,591 )
How can I increase my downloads?