David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (6):661-702 (2003)
The paper highlights a certain kind of self-falsifying utterance, which I shall call antiperformative assertions, not noted in speech-act theory thus far. By taking such assertions into account, the old question whether explicit performatives have a truth-value can be resolved. I shall show that explicit performatives are in fact self-verifyingly true, but they are not related to propositions the way ordinary assertions are; antiperformatives have the same unusual relation to propositions, but are self-falsifyingly false. Explicit performatives are speech acts performed in situations where it is important that the speaker is self-reflectively aware of what he is doing in the speech act. Antiperformatives, on the other hand, are speech acts performed in situations where lack of direct self-reflectiveness is required. In order to situate performatives and antiperformatives, the analysis is embedded within a more general discussion of self-falsifying and self-verifying assertions.
|Keywords||Linguistics Philosophy of Language Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistics Semantics Syntax|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Muffy E. A. Siegel (2006). Biscuit Conditionals: Quantification Over Potential Literal Acts. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (2):167 - 203.
C. Dutilh Novaes (2008). A Comparative Taxonomy of Medieval and Modern Approaches to Liar Sentences. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (3):227-261.
John Kearns (2007). An Illocutionary Logical Explanation of the Liar Paradox. History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (1):31-66.
Jeremy Morris (2008). Pragmatic Reflexivity in Self-Defeating and Self-Justifying Expressions. Argumentation 22 (2):205-216.
Antonino Rotolo & Corrado Roversi (2009). Norm Enactment and Performative Contradictions. Ratio Juris 22 (4):455-482.
Similar books and articles
Marina Sbisà (2006). Speech Acts Without Propositions? Grazer Philosophische Studien 72 (1):155-178.
Stefanov Gheorghe (2010). Negative Acts. Analele Universitatii Bucuresti - Filosofie (LIX):3-9.
J. Houston (1970). Truth Valuation of Explicit Performatives. Philosophical Quarterly 20 (79):139-149.
Anna Szabolcsi (1982). Model Theoretic Semantics of Performatives. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Hungarian General Linguistics. Benjamins
Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.) (1994). Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. Routledge.
Cristina Corredor (2009). The Reflexivity of Explicit Performatives. Theoria 24 (3):283-299.
Lennart Åqvist (2003). Some Remarks on Performatives in the Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):105-124.
Mark Jary (2007). Are Explicit Performatives Assertions? Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (2):207 - 234.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #94,197 of 1,796,307 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #283,261 of 1,796,307 )
How can I increase my downloads?