Proof of the Existence of Universals—and Roman Ingarden's Ontology
Metaphysica 10 (1):65-87 (2009)
| Abstract | The paper ends with an argument that says: necessarily, if there are finitely spatially extended particulars, then there are monadic universals. Before that, in order to characterize the distinction between particulars and universals, Roman Ingardenâs notions of existential moments and modes (ways) of being are presented, and a new pair of such existential moments is introduced: multiplicityâmonadicity. Also, it is argued that there are not only real universals, but instances of universals (tropes) and fictional universals too. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDaniel von Wachter (2005). Roman Ingarden’s Ontology: Existential Dependence, Substances, Ideas, and Other Things Empiricists Do Not Like. In A. Chrudzimski (ed.), Existence, Culture, and Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Ontos.
Michael J. Loux (ed.) (1970/1976). Universals and Particulars: Readings in Ontology. University of Notre Dame Press.
Charles Landesman (1971). The Problem of Universals. New York,Basic Books.
Larry Lee Blackman (1983). Russell on the Relations of Universals and Particulars. Philosophy Research Archives 9:265-278.
Herbert Hochberg (1996). Particulars, Universals and Russell's Late Ontology. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:129-137.
Paweł Rojek (2008). Three Trope Theories. Axiomathes 18 (3):359-377.
E. D. Klemke (1960). Universals and Particulars in a Phenomenalist Ontology. Philosophy of Science 27 (3):254-261.
George Bealer (1998). Universals and Properties. In Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics. Blackwell.
Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2004). Roman Ingarden. Ontology From a Phenomenological Point of View. Reports on Philosophy 22:121-142.
Theodore Sider (2006). Bare Particulars. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Halla Kim (2008). Spinoza on Universals. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:149-155.
Fraser MacBride (2005). The Particular–Universal Distinction: A Dogma of Metaphysics? Mind 114 (455):565-614.
Catherine Legg (2001). Predication and the Problem of Universals. Philosophical Papers 30 (2):117-143.
Daniel von Wachter (2005). Roman Ingarden's Ontology: Existential Dependence, Substances, Ideas, and Other Things Empiricists Do Not Like. In Existence, Culture, and Persons: The Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Ontos Verlag.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-13Total downloads33 ( #36,590 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,124 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
