Philosophy 34 (128):44 - 46 (1959)
|Abstract||In a recent broadcast talk it was said that philosophers commonly base arguments and theories on garbled versions of science. Professor Passmore's article in the April number of Philosophy seems to go some way to justifying this complaint. The article discusses the objectivity of history by a series of comparisons with science under various heads representing criteria of objectivity.|
|Keywords||John Passmore objectivity Philosophy of history|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Arthur Passmore (1951). Critical Notice. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):181 – 190.
John Arthur Passmore (1957). Christianity and Positivism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 35 (2):125 – 136.
Stephen Gaukroger (2012). Objectivity: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
John Arthur Passmore (1966/1967). A Hundred Years of Philosophy. New York, Basic Books.
John Arthur Passmore (1959). History, the Individual, and Inevitability. Philosophical Review 68 (1):93-102.
John Arthur Passmore (1999). Evidence for the Past. History and Theory 38 (1):132–139.
Jennifer Tannoch-Bland (1997). From Aperspectival Objectivity to Strong Objectivity: The Quest for Moral Objectivity. Hypatia 12 (1):155 - 178.
John Arthur Passmore (1958). The Objectivity of History. Philosophy 33 (125):97 - 111.
I. C. Jarvie (1960). Professor Passmore on the Objectivity of History. Philosophy 35 (135):355 - 356.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads12 ( #101,180 of 722,933 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,933 )
How can I increase my downloads?