Roache's Argument against the Cohabitation View

Philosophia 39 (2):309-310 (2011)
Abstract Rebecca Roache’s recent critique of David Lewis’s cohabitation view assumes that a person cannot be properly concerned about something that rules out that she ever exists. In this brief response, I argue against this assumption
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,865
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    S. Langford (2010). Reply to Roache. Analysis 70 (4):676-681.
    Simon Langford (2007). How to Defend the Cohabitation Theory. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):212–224.
    L. Andra (2007). Multiple Occupancy, Identity, and What Matters. Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):211 – 225.
    Nick Bostrom & Rebecca Roache (2007). Human Enhancement : Ethical Issues in Human Enhancement. In Jesper Ryberg, Thomas S. Petersen & Clark Wolf (eds.), New Waves in Applied Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-09-20

    Total downloads

    26 ( #48,417 of 556,803 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums