Graduate studies at Western
Ratio 22 (2):206-215 (2009)
|Abstract||It is usually taken for granted that the necessary and sufficient conditions for refraining are with respect to mental or behavioral states of agents. Let us call such accounts internalist conceptions of refraining. In this paper, I argue that internalist conditions are insufficient for refraining; and so internalist conceptions of refraining are inadequate. I conclude that a proper account of refraining must contain an externalist condition – i.e., a condition that makes reference to an agent's environment.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patricia G. Milanich (1984). Allowing, Refraining, and Failing: The Structure of Omissions. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 45 (1):57 - 67.
Carolyn R. Morillo (1977). Doing, Refraining, and the Strenuousness of Morality. American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (1):29 - 39.
Philip E. Devine (1987). Acting and Refraining/Intention and Foresight. Dialogue 26 (01):87-.
Kathleen Gill (1988). The Ontological Status of Refraining. Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (4):307-312.
O. H. Green (1979). Refraining and Responsibility. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 28:103-113.
Nuel Belnap (1991). Before Refraining: Concepts for Agency. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 34 (2):137 - 169.
Jonathan Bennett (1967). Acting and Refraining. Analysis 28 (1):30 - 31.
Robert E. Moore (1979). Refraining. Philosophical Studies 36 (4):407 - 424.
P. J. Fitzgerald (1967). Acting and Refraining. Analysis 27 (4):133 - 139.
Ming Xu (1994). Doing and Refraining From Refraining. Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (6):621 - 632.
Added to index2009-04-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,394 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?