David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Theory 61 (1):1-16 (2011)
In this essay, James Scott Johnston claims that a dispute over moral teleology lies at the basis of the debate between John Dewey and Robert M. Hutchins. This debate has very often been cast in terms of perennialism, classicism, or realism versus progressivism, experimentalism, or pragmatism. Unfortunately, casting the debate in these terms threatens to leave the reader with the impression that Dewey and Hutchins were simply talking past each other, that one was wrongheaded while the other correct, or that they held incommensurable ideological standpoints. Such an understanding obscures a deeper conflict that divided these two men and overlooks the depth of the differences in their moral outlooks. Johnston argues that both thinkers knew very well what morally significant principles and practices were at stake in the debate and, further, that this awareness, rather than the question of which foundation for education was better for students, informed their responses to one another
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shane J. Ralston, The Vital Thread Connecting Pragmatist and Marxist Ethics: Reconstructing the Dewey-Trotsky Debate.
Larry A. Hickman (2007). Pragmatism as Post-Postmodernism: Lessons From John Dewey. Fordham University Press.
James Crippen (2007). Dewey's Conception of Mind in Contemporary Debate. International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):443-450.
Todd A. Salzman (1995). Deontology and Teleology: An Investigation of the Normative Debate in Roman Catholic Moral Theology. Uitgeverij Peeters.
David Schenck Jr (1976). Recasting the "Ethics of Virtue/Ethics of Duty" Debate. Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (2):269 - 286.
William S. Lynn (1998). Contested Moralities: Animals and Moral Value in the Dear/Symanski Debate. Philosophy and Geography 1 (2):223 – 242.
Scott Johnston (2010). Dewey's 'Naturalized Hegelianism' in Operation: Experimental Inquiry as Self-Consciousness. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (3):453-476.
James Scott Johnston (2002). John Dewey and the Role of Scientific Method in Aesthetic Experience. Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (1):1-15.
Shaun O'Dwyer (2010). Pragmatism and Anti-Realism About the Past. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (3):401-422.
Shane Jesse Ralston (2011). A More Practical Pedagogical Ideal: Searching for a Criterion of Deweyan Growth. Educational Theory 61 (3):351-364.
Diannah Lowry (2003). An Investigation of Student Moral Awareness and Associated Factors in Two Cohorts of an Undergraduate Business Degree in a British University: Implications for Business Ethics Curriculum Design. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 48 (1):7-19.
E. L. M. Maeckelberghe (2002). (Mis)Understanding Singer: Replaceability of Children or Intellectual Endeavour? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):297-300.
Tom Burke (1994). Dewey's New Logic: A Reply to Russell. University of Chicago Press.
Peter W. Ross (2002). Explaining Motivated Desires. Topoi 21 (1-2):199-207.
Added to index2011-05-24
Total downloads22 ( #79,373 of 1,102,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,386 of 1,102,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?