The gongsun longzi: A translation and an analysis of its relationship to later mohist writings
Journal of Chinese Philosophy 31 (2):271–295 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesArnold Cusmariu (1983). Translation and Belief Again. Analysis 43 (1):23-25.
Jane Geaney (1999). Associate Professor of Religion. Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Desheng Zong (2000). Studies of Intensional Contexts in Mohist Writings. Philosophy East and West 50 (2):208-228.
Erica Brindley (2007). Human Agency and the Ideal of Shang Tong (Upward Conformity) in Early Mohist Writings. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (3):409–425.
Chris Fraser, More Mohist Marginalia: A Reply to Makeham on Later Mohist Canon and Explanation B 67.
Jane Geaney (1999). A Critique of A.C. Graham's Reconstruction of the "Neo-Mohist Canons". Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Chris Fraser, Mohist Canons. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Chung-ying Cheng (2007). Reinterpreting Gongsun Longzi and Critical Comments on Other Interpretations. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (4):537–560.
Im Manyul (2007). Horse-Parts, White-Parts, and Naming: Semantics, Ontology, and Compound Terms in the White Horse Dialogue. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 6 (2):167-185.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads13 ( #87,971 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,124 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
