David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):543-556 (2008)
What is, or should be, the role of defense in thinking about the justification of use of armed force? Contemporary just war thinking prioritizes defense as the principal, and perhaps the only, just cause for resorting to armed force. By contrast, classic just war tradition, while recognizing defense as justification for use of force by private persons, did not reason from self-defense to the justification of the use of force on behalf of the political community, but instead rendered the idea of just cause for resort to force in terms of the sovereign's responsibility to maintain justice, vindicating those who had suffered from injustice and punishing evildoers. This paper moves through three major stages in the historical development of just war thinking, first examining a critical phase in the formation of the classical idea of just cause as the responsibility to maintain justice, then discussing the shift, characteristic of the modern period, to an idea of sovereignty as connected to the state and the prioritization of defense of the state as just cause for use of force, and lastly showing how this conception of the priority of defense became part of the recovery of just war thinking in the latter part of the twentieth century. The paper concludes by noting recent changes in thought on international law that tend to emphasize justice at the expense of the right of self-defense, suggesting that the roots of just war thinking imply the need for a similar rethinking of contemporary just war discourse
|Keywords||sovereignty defense Westphalian system justice just war state|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John J. Davenport (2011). Just War Theory, Humanitarian Intervention, and the Need for a Democratic Federation. Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (3):493-555.
John Kelsay (2009). James Turner Johnson, Just War Tradition, and Forms of Practical Reasoning. Journal of Military Ethics 8 (3):179-189.
Cian O'Driscoll (2009). Hedgehog or Fox? An Essay on James Turner Johnson's View of History. Journal of Military Ethics 8 (3):165-178.
Nahed Artoul Zehr (2009). James Turner Johnson and the 'Classic' Just War Tradition. Journal of Military Ethics 8 (3):190-201.
Similar books and articles
Steven Metz & Phillip R. Cuccia (eds.) (2011). Defining War for the 21st Century. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
Jacob Blair (2008). Tensions in a Certain Conception of Just War as Law Enforcement. Res Publica 14 (4):303-311.
Joseph Boyle (2011). Waging Defensive War: The Idea and its Normative Importance. Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):148-159.
Suzanne Uniacke (2011). Proportionality and Self-Defense. Law and Philosophy 30 (3):253-272.
Alex J. Bellamy (2006). Just Wars: From Cicero to Iraq. Polity Press.
James Turner Johnson (2002). Paul Ramsey and the Recovery of the Just War Idea. Journal of Military Ethics 1 (2):136-144.
David Rodin (2004). War and Self-Defense. Ethics and International Affairs 18 (1):63–68.
Steve Viner (2010). Self-Defense, Punishing Unjust Combatants and Justice in War. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):297-319.
James Turner Johnson (2003). Aquinas and Luther on War and Peace: Sovereign Authority and the Use of Armed Force. Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):3-20.
James Turner Johnson (2006). The Just War Idea: The State of the Question. Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):167-195.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #76,851 of 1,102,468 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #37,092 of 1,102,468 )
How can I increase my downloads?