David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind and Language 22 (4):366–401 (2007)
Methodological dualism in linguistics occurs when its theories are subjected to standards that are inappropriate for them qua scientific theories. Despite much opposition, methodological dualism abounds in contemporary thinking. In this paper, I treat linguistics as a scientific activity and explore some instances of dualism. By extracting some ubiquitous aspects of scientific methodology from its typically quantitative expression, I show that two recent instances of methodologically dualistic critiques of linguistics are ill-founded. I then show that there are nonetheless some divergences between linguistic and other ordinary scientific methods, reflecting yet a third instance of methodological dualism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Mark C. Baker (1988). Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. University of Chicago Press.
Michael Bishop (2002). Years of Successful Predictive Modeling Should Be Enough: Lessons for Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 69 (S3):S197-S208.
Michael A. Bishop (2005). Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment. Oxford University Press.
Herman Cappelen (2005). Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Blackwell Pub..
Noam Chomsky (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. The Mit Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Kent Johnson (2011). Quantitative Realizations of Philosophy of Science: William Whewell and Statistical Methods. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):399-409.
Similar books and articles
Michael Pelczar (2008). Descartes' Dualism and Contemporary Dualism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):145-160.
William R. Uttal (2004). Dualism: The Original Sin of Cognitivism. L. Erlbaum Associates.
John A. Foster (1989). A Defense of Dualism. In J. Smythies & John Beloff (eds.), The Case for Dualism. University of Virginia Press.
Petrus Franciscus Maria Fontaine (1986). The Light and the Dark: A Cultural History of Dualism. J.C. Gieben.
Alan N. Sussman (1981). Reflection on the Chances for a Scientific Dualism. Journal of Philosophy 78 (February):95-118.
Eric Russert Kraemer & Charles Sayward (1980). Dualism and the Argument From Continuity. Philosophical Studies 37 (January):55-59.
Ludwig M. P. van den Hauwe (2011). Hayek, Gödel, and the Case for Methodological Dualism. Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (4):387-407.
Keith E. Yandell (1995). A Defense of Dualism. Faith and Philosophy 12 (4):548-566.
Yrjö Haila (2000). Beyond the Nature-Culture Dualism. Biology and Philosophy 15 (2):155-175.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #144,052 of 1,101,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #192,006 of 1,101,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?