David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 167 (1):145 - 161 (2009)
It has been much debated whether Tractarian objects are what Russell would have called particulars or whether they include also properties and relations. This paper claims that the debate is misguided: there is no logical category such that Wittgenstein intended the reader of the Tractatus to understand his objects either as providing examples of or as not providing examples of that category. This is not to say that Wittgenstein set himself against the very idea of a logical category: quite the contrary. However, where Russell presents his logical variety of particulars and the various types of universal, and Frege presents his of objects and the various types of function, Wittgenstein denies the propriety of such a priori expositions. Wittgenstein envisages a variety of logical types of entity but insists that the nature of these types is something to be discovered only through analysis.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Francis Pears (1987). The False Prison: A Study of the Development of Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Ricketts (1996). Pictures, Logic, and the Limits of Sense in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. In Hans D. Sluga & David G. Stern (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge University Press. 59--99.
Erik Stenius (1960/1981). Wittgenstein's Tractatus: A Critical Exposition of its Main Lines of Thought. Blackwell.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Campbell (2014). Categorial Indeterminacy, Generality and Logical Form in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):138-158.
Colin Johnston (2007). The Unity of a Tractarian Fact. Synthese 156 (2):231-251.
Wilfrid Sellars (1962). Naming and Saying. Philosophy of Science 29 (1):7-26.
Natan Berber (2007). The Logical Basis of the Tractarian Ontology. Axiomathes 17 (2):185-196.
Kevin C. Klement (2004). Putting Form Before Function: Logical Grammar in Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein. Philosophers' Imprint 4 (2):1-47.
Matthias Schirn (2006). Concepts, Extensions, and Frege's Logicist Project. Mind 115 (460):983-1006.
David J. Anderson & Edward N. Zalta (2004). Frege, Boolos, and Logical Objects. Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (1):1-26.
José L. Zalabardo (2010). The Tractatus on Logical Consequence. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):425-442.
Alexei Angelides (2012). Carnap's 1934 Objections to Wittgenstein's Say/Show Distinction. Erkenntnis 76 (2):147-169.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #48,889 of 1,102,134 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #34,151 of 1,102,134 )
How can I increase my downloads?