Three substitution-instance interpretations

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (3):331-354 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Puzzling pairs.Michael Nelson - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):109 - 119.
In place of the Other.Bernhard Waldenfels - 2011 - Continental Philosophy Review 44 (2):151-164.
A Uniform Logic of Information Dynamics.Wesley H. Holliday, Tomohiro Hoshi & Thomas F. Icard - 2012 - In Thomas Bolander, Torben Braüner, Silvio Ghilardi & Lawrence Moss (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic 9. College Publications. pp. 348-367.
Do we believe in penal substitution?David K. Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Papers 26 (3):203 - 209.
An Economic Paradox.Donald V. Poochigian - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 22:97-105.
Substitution and the explanation of action.Joan Bryans - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (3):365 - 376.
Introduction.Stephen David Ross - 2010 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:1-20.
Epsilon Substitution Method for $\Pi _{2}^{0}$ -FIX.Toshiyasu Arai - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (4):1155 - 1188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
26 (#595,031)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John T. Kearns
State University of New York, Buffalo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references