Three substitution-instance interpretations

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (3):331-354 (1978)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093888395
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Michael Nelson (2002). Puzzling Pairs. Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):109 - 119.
Bernhard Waldenfels (2011). In Place of the Other. Continental Philosophy Review 44 (2):151-164.
Wesley H. Holliday, Tomohiro Hoshi & Thomas F. Icard (2012). A Uniform Logic of Information Dynamics. In Thomas Bolander, Torben Braüner, Silvio Ghilardi & Lawrence Moss (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic 9. College Publications
David Lewis (1997). Do We Believe in Penal Substitution? Philosophical Papers 26 (3):203 - 209.
Donald V. Poochigian (2008). An Economic Paradox. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 22:97-105.
Stephen David Ross (2010). Introduction. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:1-20.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

4 ( #424,619 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.