David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 11 (1):71-79 (2009)
In this article I explore ways to argue about punishment of personal representations in virtual reality. I will defend the idea that such punishing might sometimes be morally required. I offer four different lines of argument: one consequentialistic, one appealing to an idea of appropriateness, one using the notion of organic wholes, and one starting from a supposed inability to determine the limits of the extension of the moral agent. I conclude that all four approaches could, in some cases, justify punishing a virtual reality representation; an avatar. As a consequence of my conclusion, I suggest that our institutionalized criminal justice system must be broadened in scope and punitive measures, in order to cover the new and difficult cases arising in virtual reality.
|Keywords||Avatars Ethics in virtual reality Extended agents Punishment Retributive justice Virtual reality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Philip Brey (1999). The Ethics of Representation and Action in Virtual Reality. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):5-14.
Andy Clark & David J. Chalmers (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis 58 (1):7-19.
G. E. Moore (1903/2004). Principia Ethica. Dover Publications.
Michael Walzer (1987). Interpretation and Social Criticism. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Marcus Schulzke (2010). Defending the Morality of Violent Video Games. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):127-138.
Jeff Dunn (2012). Virtual Worlds and Moral Evaluation. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (4):255-265.
Stefano Paoli & Aphra Kerr (2012). On Crimes and Punishments in Virtual Worlds: Bots, the Failure of Punishment and Players as Moral Entrepreneurs. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 14 (2):73-87.
Stefano De Paoli & Aphra Kerr (2012). On Crimes and Punishments in Virtual Worlds: Bots, the Failure of Punishment and Players as Moral Entrepreneurs. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (2):73-87.
Similar books and articles
Paul J. Ford (2001). A Further Analysis of the Ethics of Representation in Virtual Reality: Multi-User Environments. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 3 (2):113-121.
Antony Duff (2003). Punishment, Communication and Community. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Alex Byrne (2002). Yes, Virginia, Lemons Are Yellow. Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):213-22.
H. J. McCloskey (1965). A Non-Utilitarian Approach to Punishment. Inquiry 8 (1-4):249 – 263.
Monica Meijsing (2006). Real People and Virtual Bodies: How Disembodied Can Embodiment Be? [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 16 (4):443-461.
Michael Clark & Peter Cave (2010). Nowhere to Run? Punishing War Crimes. Res Publica 16 (2):197-207.
Greg Roebuck & David Wood (2011). A Retributive Argument Against Punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
Beth Coleman (2011). Hello Avatar. Mit Press.
Jeremy Bentham (2009). The Rationale of Punishment. Prometheus Books.
Achille C. Varzi & Giuliano Torrengo (2006). Crimes and Punishments. Philosophia 34 (4):395-404.
Added to index2009-02-16
Total downloads14 ( #111,833 of 1,098,129 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #283,807 of 1,098,129 )
How can I increase my downloads?