David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (2):165-179 (1989)
Tarski's manner of defining truth is generally considered highly significant. About why, there is less consensus. I argue first, that in his truth-definitions Tarski was trying to solve a set of philosophical problems; second, that he solved them successfully; third, that all of these that are simply problems about defining truth are as well or better solved by a simpler account of truth. But one of his crucial problems remains: to give an account of validity, one requires an account not just of truth but of truth under varying interpretations. Tarski's account has the merit of generalizing to this, to model theory and to abstract algebra
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Max Black (1949/1981). Language and Philosophy: Studies in Method. Greenwood Press.
Donald Davidson (2010). Truth and Meaning. In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing About Language. Routledge. 304 - 323.
Donald Davidson (1967). Truth and Meaning. Synthese 17 (1):304-323.
Herbert Feigl (ed.) (1949). Readings in Philosophical Analysis. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts.
John F. Fox (1987). Truthmaker. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65 (2):188 – 207.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ilkka Niiniluoto (2004). Tarski's Definition and Truth-Makers. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 126 (1-3):57-76.
Dale Jacquette (2010). Circularity or Lacunae in Tarski's Truth-Schemata. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (3):315-326.
Susan Haack (1976). Is It True What They Say About Tarski? Philosophy 51 (197):323 - 336.
Greg Frost-Arnold (2004). Was Tarski's Theory of Truth Motivated by Physicalism? History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (4):265-280.
Panu Raatikainen (2003). More on Putnam and Tarski. Synthese 135 (1):37 - 47.
Andrea Cantini (1980). A Note on Three-Valued Logic and Tarski Theorem on Truth Definitions. Studia Logica 39 (4):405 - 414.
Richard C. Jennings (1987). Tarski - a Dilemma. Inquiry 30 (1 & 2):155 – 172.
Peter Milne (1999). Tarski, Truth and Model Theory. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (2):141–167.
Dirk Greimann (1997). Die Idee Hinter Tarskis Definition Von Wahrheit. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (1):121-158.
Luis Fernández Moreno (2001). Tarskian Truth and the Correspondence Theory. Synthese 126 (1-2):123 - 147.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads11 ( #136,352 of 1,100,983 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #58,761 of 1,100,983 )
How can I increase my downloads?