What's wrong with grandma's guide to procedural semantics: A reply to Jerry Fodor
Cognition 9 (September):249-61 (1978)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||Computer Language Semantics Verificationism Fodor, J|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Stalnaker (1991). How to Do Semantics for the Language of Thought. In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
Darragh Byrne (2004). The 'Compositional Rigidity' of Recognitionality. Philosophical Papers 33 (2):147-169.
Ernest LePore & Jerry A. Fodor (1993). Reply to Critics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):673-682.
Frederick R. Adams & Kenneth Aizawa (1994). 'X' Means X: Fodor/Warfield Semantics. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 4 (2):215-31.
Frederick R. Adams & Kenneth Aizawa (1992). 'X' Means X: Semantics Fodor-Style. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 2 (2):175-83.
Daniel C. Dennett (1990). Granny's Campaign for Safe Science. In Barry M. Loewer & Georges Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and His Critics. Blackwell.
Christopher Gauker (1993). Holism Without Meaning: A Critical Review of Fodor and Lepore's Holism: A Shopper's Guide. Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):441-49.
Jerry A. Fodor (1978). Tom Swift and His Procedural Grandmother. Cognition 6 (September):229-47.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?