Topoi 4 (2):145-149 (1985)
|Abstract||This paper intends to deal with Condillacian Linguistics. Although the Condillacian philosophy of mind and analysis of language were the most important in the late eighteenth century, none of them is mentioned in Chomsky's work (1966, Cartesian Linguistics). It would be useful for the history of Western thought if Chomsky's monumental error were generally recognized and if Condillacian Linguistics were at last to find the place it rightly deserves. The main thesis of Condillac's linguistic ideas (language is the first step in the analysis of thought) is briefly presented with reference to its context and consequences.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Siobhan Chapman & Christopher Routledge (eds.) (2005). Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh University Press.
Fritz J. McDonald (2009). Linguistics, Psychology, and the Ontology of Language. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):291-301.
Jerrold J. Katz (ed.) (1985). The Philosophy of Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Gergo Somodi (2009). Ignorance Radicalized. Studia Philosophica Estonica 2:140-156.
Hayley G. Davis (2003). Rethinking Linguistics. Routledgecurzon.
Barbara C. Scholz, Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Geoffrey K. Pullum (2000). Philosophy and Linguistics. Dialogue 39 (3):605-607.
Michael Devitt (2006). Intuitions in Linguistics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):481-513.
Guy Longworth (2009). Ignorance of Linguistics: A Note on Devitt's Ignorance of Language. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):21-34.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #99,650 of 549,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,699 )
How can I increase my downloads?