Friendship and Agent-Relative Morality
Garland Pub. (2001)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Friendship Consequentialism (Ethics Agent (Philosophy Interpersonal relations Moral and ethical aspects | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | Amazon page | |||||||||
| Call number | BJ1533.F8.J65 2001 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 0815339666 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDouglas W. Portmore (1998). Can Consequentialism Be Reconciled with Our Common-Sense Moral Intuitions? Philosophical Studies 91 (1):1-19.
Douglas W. Portmore (2005). Combining Teleological Ethics with Evaluator Relativism: A Promising Result. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):95–113.
Wanda Cizewski (1992). Friendship With God? Philosophy and Theology 6 (4):369-381.
Mark Schroeder (2007). Teleology, Agent‐Relative Value, and 'Good'. Ethics 117 (2):265-000.
Marilyn Friedman (1993). What Are Friends For?: Feminist Perspectives on Personal Relationships and Moral Theory. Cornell University Press.
Douglas W. Portmore (2001). Can an Act-Consequentialist Theory Be Agent Relative? American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (4):363-77.
Diane Jeske (2001). Friendship and Reasons of Intimacy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):329-346.
Jussi Suikkanen (2009). Consequentialism, Constraints and The Good-Relative-To: A Reply to Mark Schroeder. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads21 ( #58,806 of 549,699 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,699 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
