Graduate studies at Western
Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (2):209-224 (1994)
|Abstract||One of the hallmarks of Descartes' philosophy is the doctrine that the human mind has a faculty of pure intellect. This doctrine is so central to Descartes' teaching that it is difficult to believe that any of his disciplines would abandon it. Yet this is what happened in the case of Malebranche. This paper argues that in his later philosophy Malebranche adopted a theory of divine illumination which leaves no room for a Cartesian doctrine of pure intellect. It is further argued that Malebranche's abandonment of the Cartesian doctrine left a void in his philosophy which he filled with the theory of efficacious ideas|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Jolley (1988). Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas. Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91.
Steven M. Nadler (1992). Malebranche and Ideas. Oxford University Press.
Mark Amorose (2001). Aristotle's Immortal Intellect. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:97-106.
Andrew Pessin (2000). Malebranche's Natural Theodicy and the Incompleteness of God's Volitions. Religious Studies 36 (1):47-63.
Caery A. Evangelist (2010). The Conceptual Content of Augustinian Illumination. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):3-26.
Marilena Vlad (2007). De l'unité de l'intellect à l'un absolu. Chôra 5:121-139.
Herbert A. Davidson (1992). Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect. Oxford University Press.
Alexandra Pârvan (2011). La Relation En Tant Qu'élément-Clé de l'Illumination Augustinienne. Chôra 7:87-103.
Nicholas Jolley (2003). Hume, Malebranche, and the Last Occult Quality. Philosophical Topics 31 (1/2):199-213.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #60,317 of 741,243 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,802 of 741,243 )
How can I increase my downloads?