David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (2):209-224 (1994)
One of the hallmarks of Descartes' philosophy is the doctrine that the human mind has a faculty of pure intellect. This doctrine is so central to Descartes' teaching that it is difficult to believe that any of his disciplines would abandon it. Yet this is what happened in the case of Malebranche. This paper argues that in his later philosophy Malebranche adopted a theory of divine illumination which leaves no room for a Cartesian doctrine of pure intellect. It is further argued that Malebranche's abandonment of the Cartesian doctrine left a void in his philosophy which he filled with the theory of efficacious ideas
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Walter Ott (2014). Malebranche and the Riddle of Sensation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (3):689-712.
David Scott (2008). Malebranche and Descartes on Method: Psychologism, Free Will, and Doubt. Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):581-604.
Andrew Pessin (2006). Malebranche's "Vision in God". Philosophy Compass 1 (1):36–47.
Similar books and articles
Alexandra Pârvan (2011). Études de Philosophie Antique et Médiévale. Dossier Thomas d'Aquin. Chôra 7:87-103.
Herbert A. Davidson (1992). Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect. Oxford University Press.
Marilena Vlad (2007). De l'unité de l'intellect à l'un absolu. Chôra 5:121-139.
Caery A. Evangelist (2010). The Conceptual Content of Augustinian Illumination. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):3-26.
Andrew Pessin (2000). Malebranche's Natural Theodicy and the Incompleteness of God's Volitions. Religious Studies 36 (1):47-63.
Mark Amorose (2001). Aristotle's Immortal Intellect. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:97-106.
Steven M. Nadler (1992). Malebranche and Ideas. Oxford University Press.
Nicholas Jolley (1988). Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas. Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91.
Nicholas Jolley (2003). Hume, Malebranche, and the Last Occult Quality. Philosophical Topics 31 (1/2):199-213.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #96,421 of 1,789,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #198,360 of 1,789,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?