David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1):129-130 (1986)
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) was hailed by Bertrand Russell as "one of the supreme intellects of all time." A towering figure in Seventeenth century philosophy, his complex thought has been championed and satirized in equal measure, most famously in Voltaire's Candide. In this outstanding introduction to his philosophy, Nicholas Jolley introduces and assesses the whole of Leibniz's philosophy. Beginning with an introduction to Leibniz's life and work, he carefully introduces the core elements of Leibniz's metaphysics: his theories of substance, identity and individuation; monads and space and time; and his important debate over the nature of space and time with Newton's champion, Samuel Clarke. He then introduces Leibniz's theories of mind, knowledge, and innate ideas, showing how Lenin anticipated the distinction between conscious and unconscious states, before examining his theory of free will and the problem of evil. An important feature of the book is its introduction to Leibniz'smoral and political philosophy, an overlooked aspect of his work. The final chapter assesses legacy and the impact of his philosophy on philosophy as a whole, particularly on the work of Immanuel Kant. Throughout, Nicholas Jolley places Lenin in relation to some of the other great philosophers, such as Descartes, Spinoza and Locke, and discusses Leibniz's key works, such as the Monadology and Discourse on Metaphysics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$94.54 used (22% off) $97.44 new (19% off) $114.00 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B2598.J57 2005|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Tyler Doggett (2010). Why Leibniz Thinks Descartes Was Wrong and the Scholastics Were Right. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):1 - 18.
Larry M. Jorgensen (2011). Leibniz on Memory and Consciousness. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):887-916.
John Whipple (2010). Leibniz on Divine Concurrence. Philosophy Compass 5 (10):865-879.
John Whipple (2010). The Structure of Leibnizian Simple Substances. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):379-410.
Similar books and articles
Michael J. Murray (2008). Leibniz - by Nicholas Jolley. Philosophical Books 49 (1):50-52.
Donald Rutherford (1995). Reply to Jolley's Review of Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. The Leibniz Review 5:22-26.
Anja Jauernig (2008). Leibniz on Motion and the Equivalence of Hypotheses. The Leibniz Review 18:1-40.
Brandon C. Look (2009). Leibniz and Locke on Natural Kinds. In Vlad Alexandrescu (ed.), Branching Off: The Early Moderns in Quest for the Unity of Knowledge. Zeta Books.
Stewart Duncan (2010). Leibniz on Hobbes's Materialism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):11-18.
Nicholas Jolley (ed.) (1995). The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Cambridge University Press.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1972). Leibniz. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1976). Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Nicholas Jolley (1984). Leibniz and Locke: A Study of the New Essays on Human Understanding. Oxford University Press.
Nicholas Jolley (1995). Leibniz and the Rational Order of Nature. The Leibniz Review 5:18-21.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #123,090 of 1,168,031 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,420 of 1,168,031 )
How can I increase my downloads?