Political realism and anarchy in international relations

Prolegomena 10 (1):113-130 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I critically examine an influential argument in favor of political realism. The argument claims that international relations, by analogy with Hobbes’s state of nature at the individual level, are governed by anarchy which makes it irrational for states to observe the principles of morality and justice since there are no guarantees that they will be observed by other states. However, this analogy is unsustainable due to the differences that exist between agents on the international and individual levels. Compared to the insecurity of the state of nature, the level of insecurity of international relations is lower, which makes it possible for co-operation between states to be established. This conclusion is additionally corroborated by insights of the game theories, especially those of iterated prisoner’s dilemma.

Similar books and articles

Naturalistički moralni realizam.Matej Susnik - 2005 - Prolegomena 4 (2):201-217.
Political space of ecological citizenship.Jelena Vasiljevic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (1):102-111.
Politički pluralizam Hannah Arendt.Željko Senković - 2006 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 26 (1):37-48.
Mario Kopić: Proces zapadu. Meta-politički ogledi.Marijan Krivak - 2004 - Synthesis Philosophica 19 (2):548-551.
Sabrani spisi Mihajla Đurića.Mihailo Đurić - 2009 - Beograd: Pravni fakultet univerziteta u Beogradu.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
298 (#61,366)

6 months
49 (#75,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Tvrtko Jolic
University of Zagreb (PhD)

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Theory and International Relations.Charles R. Beitz - 1979 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory.Gregory S. Kavka - 1986 - Princeton University Press.
On the citizen.Thomas Hobbes - 1998 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Richard Tuck & Michael Silverthorne.

View all 12 references / Add more references