The determination and deformation of beings: A critical interpretation of Adorno and Heidegger
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This thesis is a critical interpretation of a striking contention I call the Deformation Claim. The Deformation Claim alleges a deep deformation of beings in modernity. I extract such a claim from the work of Theodor W. Adorno and Martin Heidegger. My aim is to interpret and assess, in a more thorough manner than hitherto achieved, the respective elaborations of the Deformation Claim those thinkers provide. To that end, but mindful of challenges of interpretation and of charges even of complicity with the deformation at issue, I connect two lines of thought within each of my authors. I conjoin their accounts of the deformation of beings with what in their work answers to the determination of beings. An account of beings’ determination is an account of how beings, at a similarly ‘deep’ level to that of the Deformation Claim, are as they are.
|Keywords||Adorno Heidegger modernity determination deformation transcendental|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alison Stone (2006). Adorno and the Disenchantment of Nature. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):231-253.
David Walsh (1984). Hegel and the Deformation of Symbols. Philosophical Studies 30:49-61.
John K. Lipman (1936). The Deformation of the Earth's Crust. Thought 11 (3):498-500.
Roger Foster (2007). Adorno and Heidegger on Language and the Inexpressible. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (2):187-204.
Brian O'Connor (1998). Adorno, Heidegger and the Critique of Epistemology. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (4):43-62.
Nicholas Joll (2009). Adorno's Negative Dialectic: Theme, Point, and Methodological Status. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):233–53.
Nicholas Joll (2010). Gaps: An Inquiry Into Determination and Deformation in Adorno. Studies in Social and Political Thought 17:12–30.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-01-19
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?