David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1990)
The concept of an "idea" played a central role in 17th-century theories of mind and knowledge, but philosophers were divided over the nature of ideas. This book examines an important, but little-known, debate on this question in the work of Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes. Looking closely at the issues involved, as well as the particular context in which the debate took place, Jolley demonstrates that the debate has serious implications for a number of major topics in 17th-century philosophy.
|Keywords||Idea (Philosophy History|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$24.79 used (55% off) $50.69 new (23% off) $65.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B822.J65 1990|
|ISBN(s)||0198238193 0198244436 9780198238195|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gary Hatfield & William Epstein (1979). The Sensory Core and the Medieval Foundations of Early Modern Perceptual Theory. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 70:363-384.
Citations of this work BETA
Walter Ott (2014). Malebranche and the Riddle of Sensation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (3):689-712.
Galen Barry (2015). Cartesian Modes and The Simplicity of Mind. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (1):54-76.
Lex Newman (2009). Ideas, Pictures, and the Directness of Perception in Descartes and Locke. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):134-154.
Andrew Pessin (2010). Divine Simplicity and the Eternal Truths: Descartes and the Scholastics. Philosophia 38 (1):69-105.
Tyler Doggett (2010). Why Leibniz Thinks Descartes Was Wrong and the Scholastics Were Right. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):1 - 18.
Similar books and articles
Lawrence Nolan (2012). Malebranche on Sensory Cognition and "Seeing As". Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):21-52.
Antonia Lolordo (2005). Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation and the Nature of the Mind. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.
John Cottingham (1988). The Rationalists. Oxford University Press.
Steven M. Nadler (1992). Malebranche and Ideas. Oxford University Press.
Tad M. Schmaltz (1996). Malebranche's Theory of the Soul: A Cartesian Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Nicolas Malebranche (1997). The Search After Truth: Translated and Edited by Thomas M. Lennon and Paul J. Olscamp ; Elucidations of the Search After Truth: Translated and Edited by Thomas M. Lennon. [REVIEW] Cambridge University Press.
M. A. Stewart (ed.) (1997). Studies in Seventeenth-Century European Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Nicholas Jolley (1988). Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas. Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91.
Tad M. Schmaltz (2002). Radical Cartesianism: The French Reception of Descartes. Cambridge University Press.
Andrew Pyle (2003). Malebranche. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #143,668 of 1,934,573 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,193 of 1,934,573 )
How can I increase my downloads?