David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 67 (262):447 - 466 (1992)
In the post-Gilligan debate about the differences, if any, between the ways in which people of different genders see the moral world in which they live, I detect two assumptions. These can be found in Gilligan's early work, and have infected the thought of others. The first, perhaps surprisingly, is Kohlberg's Kantian account of one moral perspective, the one more easily or more naturally operated by men and which has come to be called the justice perspective. This is the perspective whose claims Gilligan initially found suspect, not because she thought it a distorted account of the way in which male subjects operated, but because she disputed its claims to be the only account or the best or dominant one. Throughout the ensuing debate Kohlberg's account has been left in place, and challenged not for correctness but only for uniqueness
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter Allmark (2006). An Argument for the Use of Aristotelian Method in Bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (1):69-79.
Evan Simpson (1999). Between Internalism and Externalism in Ethics. Philosophical Quarterly 50 (195):201-214.
Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (1999). On Denying A Significant Version Of The Constancy Assumption. Theoria 65 (2-3):90-113.
Michael Ridge (2005). The Many Moral Particularisms. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):83 - 106.
Karsten Klint Jensen & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (2005). Understanding Particularism. Theoria 71 (2):118-137.
Similar books and articles
Michael Slote (1998). The Justice of Caring. Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (1):171.
Claudia Card (1990). Review: Caring and Evil. [REVIEW] Hypatia 5 (1):101 - 108.
Ross Buck (2002). “Choice” and “Emotion” in Altruism: Reflections on the Morality of Justice Versus the Morality of Caring. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):254-255.
Joan F. Goodman (2008). Responding to Children's Needs: Amplifying the Caring Ethic. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (2):233-248.
Agnieszka Jaworska (2007). Caring and Internality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):529-568.
Stan van Hooft (2011). Humanity or Justice? Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):291-302.
Thomas E. Wren (2003). Martin L. Hoffman, Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice:Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Ethics 113 (2):417-419.
Warren French & Alexander Weis (2000). An Ethics of Care or an Ethics of Justice. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):125 - 136.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads15 ( #252,662 of 1,934,372 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,207 of 1,934,372 )
How can I increase my downloads?