David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):45-64 (1992)
There seems to be no clear consensus in the existing literature about the role of deontic logic in legal knowledge representation — in large part, we argue, because of an apparent misunderstanding of what deontic logic is, and a misplaced preoccupation with the surface formulation of legislative texts. Our aim in this paper is to indicate, first, which aspects of legal reasoning are addressed by deontic logic, and then to sketch out the beginnings of a methodology for its use in the analysis and representation of law.The essential point for which we argue is that deontic logic — in some form or other —needs to be taken seriously whenever it is necessary to make explicit, and then reason about, the distinction between what ought to be the case and what is the case, or as we also say, between the ideal and the actual. We take the library regulations at Imperial College as the main illustration, and small examples from genuinely legal domains to introduce specific points. In conclusion, we touch on the role of deontic logic in the development of the theory of normative positions.
|Keywords||deontic logic legal knowledge representation normative systems theory of normative positions|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Brian F. Chellas (1980). Modal Logic: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Roderick Chisholm (1963). Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives and Deontic Logic. Analysis 24 (2):33-36.
Andrew J. I. Jones & Ingmar Pörn (1985). Ideality, Sub-Ideality and Deontic Logic. Synthese 65 (2):275 - 290.
Barry Loewer & Marvin Belzer (1983). Dyadic Deontic Detachment. Synthese 54 (2):295 - 318.
J.-J. Ch Meyer (1987). A Different Approach to Deontic Logic: Deontic Logic Viewed as a Variant of Dynamic Logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1):109-136.
Citations of this work BETA
Davide Grossi, John-Jules Ch Meyer & Frank Dignum (2008). The Many Faces of Counts-As: A Formal Analysis of Constitutive Rules. Journal of Applied Logic 6 (2):192-217.
Aspassia Daskalopulu & Marek Sergot (1997). The Representation of Legal Contracts. AI and Society 11 (1-2):6-17.
Similar books and articles
Henry Prakken (1996). Two Approaches to the Formalisation of Defeasible Deontic Reasoning. Studia Logica 57 (1):73 - 90.
Andrew J. I. Jones (1990). Deontic Logic and Legal Knowledge Representation. Ratio Juris 3 (2):237-244.
José Carmo & Andrew J. I. Jones (1996). Deontic Database Constraints, Violation and Recovery. Studia Logica 57 (1):139 - 165.
Newton C. A. Costa & Walter A. Carnielli (1986). On Paraconsistent Deontic Logic. Philosophia 16 (3-4):293-305.
Leon Gumański (1983). An Extension of the Deontic Calculus DSC. Studia Logica 42 (2-3):129 - 137.
Leon Gumański (1980). On Deontic Logic. Studia Logica 39 (1):63 - 75.
Sven Ove Hansson (1997). Situationist Deontic Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):423-448.
Richard Evans (2010). Introducing Exclusion Logic as a Deontic Logic. DEON 2010 10 (1):179-195.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads50 ( #89,166 of 1,934,854 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #77,153 of 1,934,854 )
How can I increase my downloads?