Idealized and Industrialized Labor: Anatomy of a Feminist Controversy
Hypatia 27 (1):99-117 (2012)
| Abstract | Prompted by the ever-increasing cesarean rate, this paper considers the interpretive disjunct between two significant strands of feminist analysis that have arisen in the last four decades as a consequence of the phenomenon of medicalized birth. In contrast to the dominant paradigm of bioethical “Principalism,” both modes of analysis, understood as “the critique of industrialized labor” and “the critique of idealized labor,” are attentive to the way in which social discourses inform bioethical deliberation and practice, but significantly diverge in the nature of their accounts. The “industrialization critique” understands the culture of medical intervention to be impelled by an “obstetric desire” to appropriate women's reproductive potency, whereas the “idealization critique” relates new mothers’ “low childbirth satisfaction” to a pernicious normative ideal propagated by the natural childbirth movement. This paper will explore the anatomy of both critiques and interrogate their fidelity to the phenomenological insight of the body as chiasm between material and ideal. I will argue that while the insights of the idealization critique are well grounded, we must exercise caution about the critique's tendency to reductively understand the embodied experience of labor as entirely discursively produced, a gesture that risks re-performing the dematerialization of women often effected through obstetric intervention itself | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKathryn Russell (1994). A Value-Theoretic Approach to Childbirth and Reproductive Engineering. Science and Society 58 (3):287 - 314.
Paul Burkett (1996). Value, Capital and Nature: Some Ecological Implications of Marx's Critique of Political Economy. Science and Society 60 (3):332 - 359.
Norah Martin (2001). Feminist Bioethics and Psychiatry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (4):431 – 441.
Lise Vogel (2000). Domestic Labor Revisited. Science and Society 64 (2):151 - 170.
Claudia Lenz & Gertrudetr Postl (2005). The End or the Apotheosis of "Labor"? Hannah Arendts Contribution to the Question of the Good Life in Times of Global Superfluity of Human Labor Power. Hypatia 20 (2):135-154.
Cheol-Soo Park (2003). On Replacing Labor as the Substance of Value: Early and Recent Arguments. Science and Society 67 (2):160 - 172.
Mario Sáenz (2007). Living Labor in Marx. Radical Philosophy Review 10 (1):1-31.
Rosalind Ekman Ladd (1989). Women in Labor: Some Issues About Informed Consent. Hypatia 4 (3):37 - 45.
Chuang Liu (2004). Laws and Models in a Theory of Idealization. Synthese 138 (3):363 - 385.
Alison Adam (2002). Gender/Body/Machine. Ratio 15 (4):354–375.
Chuang Liu (2004). Laws and Models in a Theory of Idealization. Synthese 138 (3):363 - 385.
Rosemarie Tong (2002). Love's Labor in the Health Care System: Working Toward Gender Equity. Hypatia 17 (3):200 - 213.
Amy E. Wendling (2007). Rough, Foul-Mouthed Boys. Radical Philosophy Today 2007:49-67.
Ann Ferguson (2009). Feminist Paradigms of Solidarity and Justice. Philosophical Topics 37 (2):161-177.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-09-16Total downloads8 ( #123,037 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,069 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
