Locke on Real Essences, Intelligibility and Natural Kinds

In this paper I criticize arguments by Pauline Phemister and Matthew Stuart that John Locke's position in his An Essay Concerning Human Understanding allows for natural kinds based on similarities among real essences. On my reading of Locke, not only are similarities among real essences irrelevant to species, but natural kind theories based on them are unintelligible.
Keywords John Locke  Natural Kinds  Real Essences  Pauline Phemister  Matthew Stuart
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/jpr_2010_12
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Jan-Erik Jones, Locke on Real Essences, Intelligibility and Natural Kinds
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Judith Crane (2003). Locke's Theory of Classification. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):249 – 259.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Nigel Leary (2009). How Essentialists Misunderstand Locke. History of Philosophy Quarterly 26 (3):273-292.
Jan-Erik Jones (2007). Locke Vs. Boyle: The Real Essence of Corpuscular Species. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (4):659 – 684.
Dan Kaufman (2007). Locke on Individuation and the Corpuscular Basis of Kinds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (3):499-534.
Colin McGinn (1978). Mental States, Natural Kinds and Psychophysical Laws. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52:195-220.
B. A. Brody (1967). Natural Kinds and Real Essences. Journal of Philosophy 64 (14):431-446.
Struan Jacobs & Allan McNeish (1997). Locke, McCann, and Voluntarism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (4):349–362.
Matthew Stuart (1999). Locke on Natural Kinds. History of Philosophy Quarterly 16 (3):277 - 296.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

293 ( #7,833 of 1,911,469 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

31 ( #23,570 of 1,911,469 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.