David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy East and West 60 (3):355-368 (2010)
This is an attempt to explain, in a way familiar to contemporary ways of thinking about mereology, why someone might accept some prima facie puzzling remarks by Fazang, such as his claims that the eye of a lion is its ear and that a rafter of a building is identical to the building itself. These claims are corollaries of the Huayan Buddhist thesis that everything is part of everything else, and it is intended here to show that there is a rational basis for this thesis that involves a nonstandard notion of parthood and, importantly, that does not violate the principle of noncontradiction.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dirck Vorenkamp (2005). Reconsidering the Whiteheadian Critique of Huayan Temporal Symmetry in Light of Fazang's Views. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (2):197–210.
Nicholaos Jones (2009). Fazang's Total Power Mereology: An Interpretive Analytic Reconstruction. Asian Philosophy 19 (3):199-211.
Imre Hamar (2007). Reflecting Mirrors: Perspectives on Huayan Buddhism. Harrassowitz Verlag.
Maureen Donnelly (2011). Using Mereological Principles to Support Metaphysics. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (243):225-246.
Tao Jiang (2001). The Problematic of Whole – Part and the Horizon of the Enlightened in Huayan Buddhism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 28 (4):457–475.
Peter D. Hershock (2010). Review of Jin Y. Park, Buddhism and Postmodernity: Zen, Huayan, and the Possibility of Buddhist Postmodern Ethics. [REVIEW] Sophia 49 (1):153-155.
Jin Park (2010). Buddhism and Postmodernity: Zen, Huayan, and the Possibility of Buddhist Postmodern Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield.
Andres Siu-Kwong Tang (2011). Mou Zongsan's “Transcendental” Interpretation of Huayan Buddhism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (2):238-256.
Imre Hamar (2010). Interpretation of Yogācāra Philosophy in Huayan Buddhism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37 (2):181-197.
Nicholaos Jones (2010). Nyāya-Vaiśesika Inherence, Buddhist Reduction, and Huayan Total Power. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37 (2):215-230.
Added to index2010-07-14
Total downloads15 ( #124,718 of 1,679,365 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #183,761 of 1,679,365 )
How can I increase my downloads?