David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 51 (2):140 - 161 (2006)
Aristotle's account of place in terms of an innermost limit of a containing body was to generate serious discussion and controvery among Aristotle's later commentators, especially when it was applied to the cosmos as a whole. The problem was that since there is nothing outside of the cosmos that could contain it, the cosmos apparently could not have a place according to Aristotle's definition; however, if the cosmos does not have a place, then it is not clear that it could move, but it was thought to move, namely, in its daily revolution, which was viewed as a kind of natural locomotion and so required the cosmos to have a place. The study briefly outlines Aristotle's account of place and then considers its fate, particularly with respect to the cosmos and its motion, at the hands of later commentators. To this end, it begins with Theophrastus' puzzles concerning Aristotle's account of place, and how later Greek commentators, such as Alexander of Aphrodisias, Themistius and others, attempted to address these problems in what can only be described as ad hoc ways. It then considers Philoponus' exploitation of these problems as a means to replace Aristotle's account of place with his own account of place understood in terms of extension. The study concludes with the Arabic Neoplatonizing Aristotelian Avicenna and his novel introduction of a new category of motion, namely, motion in the category of position. Briefly, Avicenna denies that the cosmos has a place, and so claims that it moves not with respect to place, but with respect to position
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
William Wians (2008). Aristotle and the Problem of Human Knowledge. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (1):41-64.
David Macauley (2006). The Place of the Elements and the Elements of Place: Aristotelian Contributions to Environmental Thought. Ethics, Place and Environment 9 (2):187 – 206.
Benjamin Morison (2002). On Location: Aristotle's Concept of Place. Oxford University Press.
Emanuela Bianchi (2010). Sexual Topologies in the Aristotelian Cosmos: Revisiting Irigaray's Physics of Sexual Difference. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):373-389.
J. E. Malpas (1999). Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Rufus of Cornwall (2004). In Physicam Aristotelis. Oup/British Academy.
Mohan Matthen (2009). Why Does Earth Move to the Center? An Examination of Some Explanatory Strategies in Aristotle's Cosmology. In Alan C. Bowen & Christian Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle's De Caelo. Brill. 1--119.
Jon McGinnis (2006). Positioning Heaven: The Infidelity of a Faithful Aristotelian. Phronesis 51 (2):140-161.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #157,162 of 1,143,346 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,193 of 1,143,346 )
How can I increase my downloads?