Special sciences: Still a flawed argument after all these years
Cognitive Science 28 (3):409-432 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesOwen D. Jones (2007). Implications for Law of a Unified Behavioral Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):30-31.
Alex Byrne (1998). Dennett Versus Gibson. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):751-752.
Carsten Griesel, The Type-Token Distinction and the Mind and Brain Sciences. Reduction and the Special Sciences (Tilburg, April 10-12, 2008).
Alexander Reutlinger (2011). A Theory of Non-Universal Laws. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):97 - 117.
Jerry A. Fodor (1997). Special Sciences: Still Autonomous After All These Years. Philosophical Perspectives 11:149-63.
Suzanne Bliss & Jordi Fernández (2011). Does the Supervenience Argument Generalize? Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (4):321-346.
Ned Block (2008). Anti-Reductionism Slaps Back. Noûs 31:107-132.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #78,761 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
