When Teachers Must Let Education Hurt: Rousseau and Nietzsche on Compassion and the Educational Value of Suffering
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophy of Education 44 (1):45-60 (2010)
Avi Mintz (2008) has recently argued that Anglo-American educators have a tendency to alleviate student suffering in the classroom. According to Mintz, this tendency can be detrimental because certain kinds of suffering actually enhance student learning. While Mintz compellingly describes the effects of educator's desires to alleviate suffering in students, he does not examine one of the roots of the desire: the feeling of compassion or pity (used as synonyms here). Compassion leads many teachers to unreflectively alleviate student struggles. While there are certainly times when compassion is necessary to help students learn, there are other times when it must be overcome. Compassion in the classroom is a two-edged sword that must be carefully employed; and yet it is often assumed that it is an unequivocal good that ought to trump all other impulses. In this article I hope to raise awareness concerning the promises and pitfalls of compassion in education by examining the theories of two historical figures who famously emphasised compassion in their philosophical writings: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Friedrich Nietzsche. Rousseau and Nietzsche argue that compassion is a powerful educational force but that it must be properly employed. For Rousseau and Nietzsche, compassion is necessary to develop self-mastery in human beings—the ultimate goal of education—but it is a compassion that must hurt in order to help. My hope is that Rousseau's and Nietzsche's ideas on compassion will encourage thoughtful reflection on the uses and abuses of compassion in education
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michel Foucault & Paul Rabinow (1984). The Foucault Reader. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Brian Leiter (2014). Nietzsche on Morality. Routledge.
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1974). The Gay Science. New York,Vintage Books.
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1968). The Will to Power. London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Citations of this work BETA
Douglas W. Yacek (2014). Going to School with Friedrich Nietzsche: The Self in Service of Noble Culture. Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (4):391-411.
Mark E. Jonas (2016). Rousseau on Sex-Roles, Education and Happiness. Studies in Philosophy and Education 35 (2):145-161.
Morwenna Griffiths, Kenneth Wain, Bob Davis & Pádraig Hogan (2012). Symposium on The New Significance of Learning: Imagination's Heartwork. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (3):334-348.
Similar books and articles
L. W. Ekstrom (2012). Liars, Medicine, and Compassion. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (2):159-180.
Pedro Ortega Ruiz & Ramon Minguez Vallejos (1999). The Role of Compassion in Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 28 (1):5-17.
William Edelglass (2006). Levinas on Suffering and Compassion. Sophia 45 (2):43-59.
Elisabeth J. Porter (2006). Can Politics Practice Compassion? Hypatia 21 (4):97-123.
Lani Roberts (2001). Barriers to Feeling and Actualizing Compassion. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (1):13-19.
Margreet van der Cingel (2009). Compassion and Professional Care: Exploring the Domain. Nursing Philosophy 10 (2):124-136.
Peter Nilsson (2011). On the Suffering of Compassion. Philosophia 39 (1):125-144.
Richard White (2008). Rousseau and the Education of Compassion. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):35-48.
Added to index2010-03-19
Total downloads79 ( #60,622 of 1,902,889 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #446,006 of 1,902,889 )
How can I increase my downloads?