When Teachers Must Let Education Hurt: Rousseau and Nietzsche on Compassion and the Educational Value of Suffering
Journal of Philosophy of Education 44 (1):45-60 (2010)
| Abstract | Avi Mintz (2008) has recently argued that Anglo-American educators have a tendency to alleviate student suffering in the classroom. According to Mintz, this tendency can be detrimental because certain kinds of suffering actually enhance student learning. While Mintz compellingly describes the effects of educator's desires to alleviate suffering in students, he does not examine one of the roots of the desire: the feeling of compassion or pity (used as synonyms here). Compassion leads many teachers to unreflectively alleviate student struggles. While there are certainly times when compassion is necessary to help students learn, there are other times when it must be overcome. Compassion in the classroom is a two-edged sword that must be carefully employed; and yet it is often assumed that it is an unequivocal good that ought to trump all other impulses. In this article I hope to raise awareness concerning the promises and pitfalls of compassion in education by examining the theories of two historical figures who famously emphasised compassion in their philosophical writings: Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Friedrich Nietzsche. Rousseau and Nietzsche argue that compassion is a powerful educational force but that it must be properly employed. For Rousseau and Nietzsche, compassion is necessary to develop self-mastery in human beings—the ultimate goal of education—but it is a compassion that must hurt in order to help. My hope is that Rousseau's and Nietzsche's ideas on compassion will encourage thoughtful reflection on the uses and abuses of compassion in education | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRoger Crisp (2008). Compassion and Beyond. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (3):233 - 246.
L. W. Ekstrom (2012). Liars, Medicine, and Compassion. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (2):159-180.
Pedro Ortega Ruiz & Ramon Minguez Vallejos (1999). The Role of Compassion in Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 28 (1):5-17.
Elisabeth J. Porter (2006). Can Politics Practice Compassion? Hypatia 21 (4):97-123.
Lani Roberts (2001). Barriers to Feeling and Actualizing Compassion. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (1):13-19.
Richard Boyd (2004). Pity's Pathologies Portrayed: Rousseau and the Limits of Democratic Compassion. Political Theory 32 (4):519-546.
Margreet van der Cingel (2009). Compassion and Professional Care: Exploring the Domain. Nursing Philosophy 10 (2):124-136.
Peter Nilsson (2011). On the Suffering of Compassion. Philosophia 39 (1):125-144.
Richard White (2008). Rousseau and the Education of Compassion. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):35-48.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-03-19Total downloads60 ( #15,965 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
