Modeling occurrences of objects in relations
Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (1):145-174 (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGlyn W. Humphreys & M. Jane Riddoch (2007). How to Define an Object: Evidence From the Effects of Action on Perception and Attention. Mind and Language 22 (5):534–547.
Hans Kraml (1998). States of Affairs. Erkenntnis 48 (2-3):311-324.
Toomas Karmo (1982). Occurrences and Pseudo-Occurrences. Synthese 52 (2):299 - 312.
Kosta Došen & Zoran Petrić (2003). Generality of Proofs and its Brauerian Representation. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (3):740-750.
Saskia van Dantzig, Antonino Raffone & Bernhard Hommel (2011). Acquiring Contextualized Concepts: A Connectionist Approach. Cognitive Science 35 (6):1162-1189.
Wolfgang Freitag (2008). Truthmakers (Are Indexed Combinations). Studia Philosophica Estonica 1:228-248.
Włodek Rabinowicz (2009). Values Compared. Polish Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):73-96.
Joop Leo (2008). Modeling Relations. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (4).
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-02-07Total downloads4 ( #180,404 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
