Ce QUI Fait encore cruellement défaut à l'intelligence artificielle

Informations in Cognito 7:1-4 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence still lacks an adequate theory of meaning. Maybe the obstacles we observe to the progress of AI are partially imaginary. We suppose for instance that there is an essential difference between opening a window « mechanically » because someone has asked us to do so and converting to a religion under the inspiration of a preacher. What if the phenomena were in fact of a similar nature: the power on a mind that a word has through its meaning? The model of a gradient in memory associations generating discourse with emergent logical properties suggests we never intend to say the sentences we utter, but simply register - like anyone else - what are the words that our mouth utters. What we hear ourselves saying re-launches the affect dynamics underpinning our speaking, just as do sentences we hear when uttered by others.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
5 (#1,514,558)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references