David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 80 (1):63--79 (1989)
An interdisciplinary fusion between the philosophy of science and the teaching of science can help to eradicate the disciplinary rigidity entrenched in both. In this paper I approach the history of sciencethematically, identifying general themes which transcend the boundaries of individual disciplines. Such conceptual themes can be used as a basis for an interdisciplinary introduction to university science, encouraging certain important cognitive skills not exercised during the disciplinary training emphasised in traditional approaches. Courses which teach themes such as conservation, randomness, and holism/reductionism have already proved successful, and these innovations should encourage philosophers and historians to explore the exciting new possibilities which arise from stepping outside the confines of a single discipline.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
William Bechtel (ed.) (1986). Integrating Scientific Disciplines. University of Chicago Press.
Niels Bohr (1958/2010). Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York, Wiley.
Richard M. Burian (1986). On Integrating the Study of Evolution and of Development. In William Bechtel (ed.), Integrating Scientific Disciplines. 209--228.
Paul Forman (1971). Weimar Culture, Causality, and Quantum Theory, 1918-1927: Adaptation by German Physicists and Mathematicians to a Hostile Intellectual Environment. [REVIEW] Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3 (1).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Frodeman (ed.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press.
J. Heal (1999). Review. Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. P Carruthers, J Boucher [Eds]. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (2):305-308.
Michael R. Matthews (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
Yasushi Maruyama (2006). The Teaching/Telling Distinction Revisited. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:93-97.
Jorge Luis Nicolas Audy & Marília Morosini (eds.) (2007). Innovation and Interdisciplinarity in the University =. Edipucrs.
Bart van Klink & Sanne Taekema, A Dynamic Model of Interdisciplinarity: Limits and Possibilities of Interdisciplinary Research Into Law.
Michael R. Matthews (1989). History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching: A Brief Review. Synthese 80 (1):1 - 7.
Wim J. Steen (1990). Interdisciplinary Integration in Biology? An Overview. Acta Biotheoretica 38 (1).
Alison Wylie (1994). Discourse, Practice, Context: From HPS to Interdisciplinary Science Studies. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:393 - 395.
William Bechtel & Mitchell Herschbach (2010). Philosophy of the Cognitive Sciences. In Fritz Allhoff (ed.), Philosophies of the Sciences. Wiley-Blackwell. 239--261.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #200,779 of 1,692,917 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #114,250 of 1,692,917 )
How can I increase my downloads?