David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 6 (21):30- (1931)
Those who still interest themselves in problems connected with God, Freedom, and Immortality are not accustomed to look to natural science for any light on these dark places. It is usually admitted that the scientific method operates with basic assumptions which are far from binding on philosophers, and which indeed have no very satisfactory metaphysical authority. In spite of a few protests by philosophers, scientific thinkers have on the whole felt entitled to neglect the philosophical consequences of their theories, and have gone ahead in the investigation of nature by accepting only such hypotheses as explained the maximum number of known facts, irrespective of their possible results on other fields of work. When a strictly scientific theory is invested with philosophical importance, some form of materialism, however well disguised, usually results
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Larmer (2009). Divine Agency and the Principle of the Conservation of Energy. Zygon 44 (3):543-557.
Paul J. Bagley (1990). Deism, Masonry, and the Enlightenment. Review of Metaphysics 44 (1):151-153.
Dorothy B. Schlegel (1956). Shaftesbury and the French Deists. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press.
Walter McIntosh Merrill (1949). From Statesman to Philosopher. New York, Philosophical Library.
Joseph Needham (1936/1968). Order and Life. Cambridge, M.I.T. Press.
Author unknown, French Deism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Author unknown, English Deism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
C. J. Betts (1984). Early Deism in France: From the so-Called "Déistes" of Lyon (1564) to Voltaire's "Lettres Philosophiques" (1734). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Marc Ereshefsky (2010). What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism. Philosophy of Science 77 (5):674-685.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads3 ( #483,044 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?