Graduate studies at Western
History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):267-290 (1999)
|Abstract||Each science has its own domain of investigation, but one and the same science can be formalized in different languages with different universes of discourse. The concept of the domain of a science and the concept of the universe of discourse of a formalization of a science are distinct, although they often coincide in extension. In order to analyse the presuppositions and implications of choices of domain and universe, this article discusses the treatment of omega arguments in three very different formalizations of arithmetic. In Peano's formalization the domain is a restricted class of individuals, while the universe of discourse is the unrestricted class of all individuals. In Gödel's formalization the domain is a restricted class of individuals as in Peano's formalization, but the universe of discourse coincides with the domain. In Whitehead-Russell's formalization the domain is a class of logical notions in Tarski's sense, that are necessarily not individuals, whereas the universe of discourse is the unrestricted class of individuals as in Peano's formalization. The present approach emphasizes the viewpoint that the universe of discourse of a given discourse is important in determining which propositions are expressed by which sentences|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dominic Abrams & Michael A. Hogg (1990). The Context of Discourse: Let's Not Throw Out the Baby with the Bathwater. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):219 – 225.
Ian Parker (1990). Discourse: Definitions and Contradictions. Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):187 – 204.
Livia Polanyi, Martin van den Berg & David Ahn (2003). Discourse Structure and Sentential Information Structure. An Initial Proposal. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (3):337-350.
Douglas Edwards (2012). On Alethic Disjunctivism. Dialectica 66 (1):200-214.
Anatoliy Ishmuratov (1994). Quest Schemes in Analytical Models of Discourse. Synthese 100 (1):29 - 38.
Patrick Saint-Dizier (2012). Processing Natural Language Arguments with the Platform. Argument and Computation 3 (1):49 - 82.
John Corcoran & José Miguel Sagüillo (2011). The Absence of Multiple Universes of Discourse in the 1936 Tarski Consequence-Definition Paper. History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (4):359 - 374.
Christopher Gauker (1997). Domain of Discourse. Mind 106 (421):1-32.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1987). Domains of Discourse. Logique Et Analyse 117:173-176.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads4 ( #189,291 of 739,360 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,360 )
How can I increase my downloads?