Issues in Data Management
Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):743-748 (2010)
| Abstract | Data management raises a number of issues, both regulatory and non-regulatory. Researchers should understand how data are defined by their particular institutions and regulatory authorities. Data are the bases of scientific communication and provide a strong defense against allegations of scientific misconduct. Authorization is often necessary before collection of data can commence. Proper handling, retention, and storage of data, especially that involving humans, are crucial for the researcher. Data ownership by the institution leads to a responsibility by the institution to educate all its researchers in responsible data management practices | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSharon S. Krag (forthcoming). Issues in Data Management. Science and Engineering Ethics.
Julia Frigoli, Anne M. Etgen & Michael Kuhar (2010). Developing and Communicating Responsible Data Management Policies to Trainees and Colleagues. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):753-762.
Joe Giffels, Sara Vollmer & Stephanie Bird (2010). Editors' Overview: Topics in the Responsible Management of Research Data. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):631-637.
Lisa Geller (2010). Data Management in Academic Settings: An Intellectual Property Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):769-775.
Todd Harris (2003). Data Models and the Acquisition and Manipulation of Data. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1508-1517.
Julie Richardson & Diane Hoffman-Kim (2010). The Importance of Defining 'Data' in Data Management Policies. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):749-751.
Mark Sharfman (1996). The Construct Validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg & Domini Social Performance Ratings Data. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (3):287 - 296.
Dinah Payne & Cherie Courseault Trumbach (2009). Data Mining: Proprietary Rights, People and Proposals. Business Ethics 18 (3):241-252.
P. Langat, D. Pisartchik, D. Silva, C. Bernard, K. Olsen, M. Smith, S. Sahni & R. Upshur (2011). Is There a Duty to Share? Ethics of Sharing Research Data in the Context of Public Health Emergencies. Public Health Ethics 4 (1):4-11.
Clark A. Chinn & William F. Brewer (1996). Mental Models in Data Interpretation. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):219.
Lawrence J. Rhoades (2002). Beyond Conflict of Interest: The Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3).
Anthony Danna & Oscar H. Gandy (2002). All That Glitters is Not Gold: Digging Beneath the Surface of Data Mining. Journal of Business Ethics 40 (4):373 - 386.
Jan Doroszewski (1988). Ethical and Methodological Aspects of Medical Computer Data Bases and Knowledge Bases. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 9 (2).
Christopher J. Cowton (1998). The Use of Secondary Data in Business Ethics Research. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (4):423-434.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2009). First-Person Data, Publicity and Self-Measurement. Philosophers' Imprint 9 (9):1-16.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-11-18Total downloads4 ( #180,507 of 556,888 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
