David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 35 (3):273-302 (2004)
: The Bush administration's military war on terrorism is a blunt, ineffective, and unjust response to the threat posed to innocent civilians by terrorism. Decentralized terrorist networks can only be effectively fought by international cooperation among police and intelligence agencies representing diverse nation‐states, including ones with predominantly Islamic populations. The Bush administration's allegations of a global Islamist terrorist threat to the national interests of the United States misread the decentralized and complex nature of Islamist politics. Undoubtedly there exists a “combat fundamentalist” element within Islamism. But the threat posed to U.S. citizens by Islamist terrorism neither necessitates nor justifies as a response massive military invasions of other nations. Not only does the Bush administration's war on alleged “terrorist states” violate the doctrine of just war, but in addition these wars arise from a new, unilateral, imperial foreign‐policy doctrine of “preventive wars.” Such a doctrine will isolate the United States from international institutions and long‐standing allies. The weakening of these institutions and alliances will only weaken the ability of the international community to deter terrorism
|Keywords||preventive wars Islam national‐security doctrine Islamist politics unilateralism U.S. foreign policy terrorism preemptive wars just‐war theory just wars Afghanistan Iraq imperialism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Barrie Paskins & Michael Walzer (1981). Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. Philosophical Quarterly 31 (124):285.
Roxanne L. Euben (2002). Killing (for) Politics: Jihad, Martyrdom, and Political Action. Political Theory 30 (1):4-35.
Citations of this work BETA
Mark Rigstad, The 'Bush Doctrine' as a Hegemonic Discourse Strategy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.
Willem Schinkel (2009). On the Concept of Terrorism. Contemporary Political Theory 8 (2):176.
Willem Schinkel (2009). On the Concept of Terrorism. Contemporary Political Theory 8 (2):176-198.
Mark Rigstad (2009). The ‘Bush Doctrine’ as a Hegemonic Discourse Strategy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (3):377-398.
Similar books and articles
Andrew Fiala (2005). Defusing Fear : A Critical Response to the War on Terrorism. In Timothy Shanahan (ed.), Philosophy 9/11: Thinking About the War on Terrorism. Open Court
Igor Primoratz (ed.) (2004). Terrorism: The Philosophical Issues. Palgrave Macmillan.
Nicholas Maxwell (2007). The Disastrous War Against Terrorism: Violence Versus Enlightenment. In Albert W. Merkidze (ed.), Terrorism Issues: Threat Assessment , Consequences and Prevention.
Virginia Held (2004). Terrorism and War. Journal of Ethics 8 (1):59-75.
David Rodin (ed.) (2007). War, Torture and Terrorism: Ethics and War in the 21st Century. Blackwell Pub..
Bat-Ami Bar On (2003). Terrorism, Evil, and Everyday Depravity. Hypatia 18 (1):157 - 163.
Bat-Ami Bar On (2003). Terrorism, Evil, and Everyday Depravity. Hypatia 18 (1):157-163.
Claudia Card (2003). Questions Regarding a War on Terrorism. Hypatia 18 (1):164 - 169.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads45 ( #97,854 of 1,934,362 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #76,889 of 1,934,362 )
How can I increase my downloads?