Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The UQV theory is a metaphysical theory that the universe is the consequence of the ultimate questioner’s vanity . This theory builds on the NSTP (Non – Spatial Thinking Process) theoretical metaphysical semi-solipsism, the position, which specifically regards the NSTP theoretical superhuman mind as a personal philosophical questioning supermind. The UQV theory further speculates the existence of the ultimate questioner, which, existing logically/conceptually beyond the superhuman mind, initiated the existence of my NSTP in order to ask an apparently unanswerable (philosophical) question about the nature of its own existence. And since the NSTP is extremely orderly and deterministic, the ultimate questioner already knows if the NSTP would or would not answer the question. Therefore, the theory states that the universe, which includes my NSTP, and possibly the superhuman mind, and even the necessary truths, is the product/consequence of the ultimate questioner’s vanity, the vanity of its own existence and intelligence. The theory is constituted of one postulate, one law, and three conjectures|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Kedar Joshi (2005). The Nstp (Non - Spatial Thinking Process) Theory. In [Book Chapter].
Douglas Walton (2004). A New Dialectical Theory of Explanation. Philosophical Explorations 7 (1):71 – 89.
Joshi Kedar (2002). The Quantum Conscious Mastermind and Unconscious Machines: With a Revolutionary NSTP (Non-Spatial Thinking Process) Theory. Pune: K Joshi.
Nicholas Maxwell (2006). Special Relativity, Time, Probabilism, and Ultimate Reality. In D. Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime. Elsevier, B. V.
Joseph Glanvill (1970). The Vanity of Dogmatizing: The Three Versions. [Brighton]the Harvester Press Ltd..
Philip A. Reed (2012). The Alliance of Virtue and Vanity in Hume's Moral Theory. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (4):595-614.
Richard C. Francis (1990). Causes, Proximate and Ultimate. Biology and Philosophy 5 (4):401-415.
Attila Grandpierre (2002). The Fundamental Principles of Existence and the Origin of Physical Laws. Ultimate Reality and Meaning 25 (2):127-147.
Michael Heller (2004). Algebraic Self-Dualityc as the ”Ultimate Explanation”. Foundations of Science 9 (4):369-385.
Giuseppe Ferraro (2013). A Criticism of M. Siderits and J. L. Garfield's 'Semantic Interpretation' of Nāgārjuna's Theory of Two Truths. Journal of Indian Philosophy 41 (2):195-219.
Joseph Glanvill (1931). The Vanity of Dogmatizing. New York, Pub. For the Facsimile Text Society by Columbia University Press.
Ann Garry (1982). Narcissism and Vanity. Social Theory and Practice 8 (2):145-153.
David Haig (2013). Proximate and Ultimate Causes: How Come? And What For? [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 28 (5):781-786.
Jon McGinnis (2011). The Ultimate Why Question: Avicenna on Why God Is Absolutely Necessary. In The Ultimate Why Question: Why is There Anything at All Rather Than Nothing Whatsoever? Cath Univ Amer Pr.
Added to index2010-09-24
Total downloads3 ( #213,863 of 739,578 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?