David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):23 – 26 (2008)
The Groningen Protocol allows active euthanasia of severely ill newborns with unbearable suffering. Defenders of the protocol insist that the protocol refers to terminally ill infants and that quality of life should not be a factor in the decision to euthanize an infant. They also argue that there should be no ethical difference between active and passive euthanasia of these infants. However, nowhere in the protocol does it refer to terminally ill infants; on the contrary, the developers of the protocol take into account the future quality of life of the infant. We also note how the Nazi Euthanasie Programm started with the premise that there is some life not worthy of living. Therefore, in our opinion, the protocol violates the traditional ethical codes of physicians and the moral values of the overwhelming majority of the citizens of the world.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Martine C. de Vries & A. A. Eduard Verhagen (2008). A Case Against Something That is Not the Case: The Groningen Protocol and the Moral Principle of Non-Maleficence. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):29 – 31.
Stephen Hanson (2009). Still on the Same Slope: Groningen Breaks No New Ethical Ground. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (4):67-68.
Similar books and articles
A. B. Jotkowitz (2006). The Groningen Protocol: Another Perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (3):157-158.
Arjen Hommersom, John-jules Meyer & Erik De vink (2004). Update Semantics of Security Protocols. Synthese 142 (2):229 - 267.
Alexander A. Kon (2008). We Cannot Accurately Predict the Extent of an Infant's Future Suffering: The Groningen Protocol is Too Dangerous to Support. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):27 – 29.
Zhenming Zhai (1990). The Problem of Protocol Statements and Schlick's Concept of "Konstatierungen". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:15 - 23.
Margaret Otlowski (1997). Voluntary Euthanasia and the Common Law. Clarendon Press.
Jacob M. Appel (2009). Neonatal Euthanasia: Why Require Parental Consent? [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (4):477-482.
E. Verhagen & P. J. J. Sauer (2005). The Groningen Protocol - Euthanasia in Severely Ill Newborns. New England Journal of Medicine 352 (10):959-962.
B. A. Manninen (2006). A Case for Justified Non-Voluntary Active Euthanasia: Exploring the Ethics of the Groningen Protocol. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (11):643-651.
Alexander A. Kon (2007). Neonatal Euthanasia is Unsupportable: The Groningen Protocol Should Be Abandoned. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):453-463.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads57 ( #32,027 of 1,413,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #153,719 of 1,413,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?