David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):107 – 128 (2005)
The Hippocratic Oath, the Hippocratic tradition, and Hippocratic ethics are widely invoked in the popular medical culture as conveying a direction to medical practice and the medical profession. This study critically addresses these invocations of Hippocratic guideposts, noting that reliance on the Hippocratic ethos and the Oath requires establishingwhat the Oath meant to its author, its original community of reception, and generally for ancient medicine what relationships contemporary invocations of the Oath and the tradition have to the original meaning of the Oath and its original reception what continuity exists and under what circumstances over the last two-and-a-half millenniums of medical-moral reflections what continuity there is in the meaning of professionalism from the time of Hippocrates to the 21st century, and what social factors in particular have transformed the medical profession in particular countries. This article argues that the resources for a better understanding of medical professionalism lie not in the Hippocratic Oath, tradition, or ethos in and of themselves. Rather, it must be found in a philosophy of medicine that explores the values internal to medicine, thus providing a medical-moral philosophy so as to be able to resist the deformation of medical professionalism by bioethics, biopolitics, and governmental regulation. The Oath, as well as Stephen H. Miles' recent monograph, The Hippocratic Oath and the Ethics of Medicine, are employed as heuristics, so as to throw into better light the extent to which the Hippocratic Oath, tradition, and ethics can provide guidance and direction, as well as to show the necessity of taking seriously the need for a substantive philosophy of medicine.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Albert R. Jonsen (2000). A Short History of Medical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Clifford Allbutt (1925). The Doctor's Oath: The Early Forms of the Hippocratic Oath. With Translations and an Essay. By W. H. S. Jones. One Vol. Pp. 62; 2 MSS. Facsimiles and Medieval Effigy of Hippocrates on Cover. Cambridge: University Press, MCMXXIV. 7s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (5-6):139-.
Simon Mills (2005). A Review Of: “Stephen H. Miles. 2003.The Hippocratic Oath and the Ethics of Medicine”. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):90-92.
Shlomo Pines (1975). The Oath of Asaph the Physician and Yoḥanan Ben Zabda: Its Relation to the Hippocratic Oath and the Doctrina Duarum Viarum of the Didachē. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.
Y. Michael Barilan & Moshe Weintraub (2001). Pantagruelism: A Rabelaisian Inspiration for Understanding Poisoning, Euthanasia and Abortion in the Hippocratic Oath and in Contemporary Clinical Practice. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (3):269-286.
W. H. S. Jones (1945). The Hippocratic Oath Ludwig Edelstein: The Hippocratic Oath. Text, Translation, and Interpretation. Pp. Vii+64. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1943. Paper, $1.25. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 59 (01):14-15.
Chester R. Burns (ed.) (1977). Legacies in Ethics and Medicine. Science History Publications.
Lisa Keränen (2001). The Hippocratic Oath as Epideictic Rhetoric: Reanimating Medicine's Past for Its Future. Journal of Medical Humanities 22 (1):55-68.
Steven H. Miles (2004). The Hippocratic Oath and the Ethics of Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #55,286 of 1,102,720 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #120,386 of 1,102,720 )
How can I increase my downloads?